1995
DOI: 10.1016/0149-2918(95)80050-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of oxaprozin and nabumetone in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were more women (67.9%) than men, and the median duration of symptoms was 8.2 years. The weighted mean baseline pain of 64.1 mm on a visual analogue scale was calculated from all but three trials 37 51 52. Six reports provided data of body mass index with a median mean value of 31.2 32 35 38 43 44 48.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were more women (67.9%) than men, and the median duration of symptoms was 8.2 years. The weighted mean baseline pain of 64.1 mm on a visual analogue scale was calculated from all but three trials 37 51 52. Six reports provided data of body mass index with a median mean value of 31.2 32 35 38 43 44 48.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirteen trials of oral NSAIDs (Weaver et al, 1995;Makarowski et al, 1996;Simon et al, 1998;Bensen et al, 1999;Zhao et al, 1999a;Ehrich et al, 2001;McKenna et al, 2001a,b;Williams et al, 2001;Gottesdiener et al, 2002;Case et al, 2003;Gibofsky et al, 2003;Kivitz et al, 2004) and one trial of topical NSAID gel (Grace et al, 1999) employed an additional criterion by requiring a predefined minimum flare of symptoms when oral paracetamol or NSAID treatment was discontinued for pretreatment wash-out. Females dominated at 63.2%.…”
Section: Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For efficacy analysis at weeks 6-12 after start of therapy, follow-up data were available from 3 trials of paracetamol (Case et al, 2003;Miceli-Richard et al, 2004;Pincus and Koch, 2004), 14 trials of oral NSAIDs (Lee et al, 1985;Weaver et al, 1995;Bensen et al, 1999;Zhao et al, 1999b;Ehrich et al, 2001;McKenna et al, 2001a,b;Gottesdiener et al, 2002;Kivitz et al, 2002;Gibofsky et al, 2003;Kivitz et al, 2004;Tannenbaum et al, 2004;Lehmann et al, 2005;Sheldon et al, 2005), 5 trials of steroid injections (Friedman and Moore, 1980;Gaffney et al, 1995;Jones et al, 1995;Ravaud et al, 1999;Smith et al, 2003), and from a single trial of topical NSAIDs (Bookman et al, 2004). For paracetamol, efficacy did not change during the followup period, and corresponded to 4.0 mm [95% CI 1.1-6.9] on VAS at week 12.…”
Section: Secondary Outcome -Time-effect Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Why patients might respond to one agent and not another remains unclear. Because interruption of Cox-1, which is common to essentially all NSAIDs, results in blockade of essential gastrointestinal tract tissue protection, all NSAIDs are associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding 27–31. Cox-2 inhibition should not be viewed as an absolute category; isoform selectivity for Cox-2 selection is not an absolute but rather a continuous discrete variable.…”
Section: Is There Any Difference Between the Nsaids Available?mentioning
confidence: 99%