Comparison of the Efficacy of TNO and Titmus Fly in Myopic Anisometropes

Kiran, Ayesha; Rashid, Faisal; Siddique, Muhammad Hussnain; Jabbar, Maryam; Shahid, Muhammad Hamza; Khokhar, Sehrish Qayyum; Niazi, Mashal; Aftab, Warda; Naseem, Kousar

doi:10.53350/pjmhs22166321

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Amblyopia is basically divided into traditional four types in general; with each type having different etiology and impact visual processing in-its-own-way (Lovett et al, 2019). Anisometropic amblyopia is caused by unequal refractive errors between the two eyes leading to the second eye being less dominant having low visual acuity in-it (Kiran et al, 2022). Strabismic is caused due to the eyes not being aligned which then leads to suppression of the deviating eye to stop double vision (Economides & Adams, 2021;Shah & Petal, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Amblyopia on Color Vision and Contrast Sensitivity: A Systematic Review

Tahami Babar,

Rubab naqvi,

Qurba Kiran

et al. 2024

JHRR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: This systematic review aims at evaluating broader implications of amblyopia disorder for color vision and contrast sensitivity in the context of challenging the conventional approach to treatment, when visual acuity is only treated. The review will establish whether traditional and modern treatment approaches are effective in improving the above visual functions in patients. It is argued that modern treatments are more effective in ameliorating broader ranges of visual dysfunctions. Methods: For the purpose of the systematic review, a comprehensive search across such databases as PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest to find the studies published from 2008 to 2024 was conducted. Criteria for inclusion in the systematic review comprised of the following the review included randomized clinical trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies if the treatment was related to the impacts on color vision and contrast sensitivity in individuals with amblyopia. The exclusion criteria included the unavailability of section on the treatment analysis. Results: The review conveys the results of studies incorporated of 43 full texts. There was substantial heterogeneity in the type of treatments and outcomes. It was found that traditional treatments, such as patching improves visual acuity, but the approach does not have a substantial effect on contrast sensitivity or color vision. On the other hand, advanced therapies overcoming these traditional deficiencies, such as perceptual learning, dichoptic training, and binocular therapy may improve contrast sensitivity by up to 40% and color vision by 30%, respectively. To conclude, modern approaches are substantially superior to traditional ones. Conclusion: The findings suggest that modern therapies offer a more comprehensive solution for ameliorating a wider range of visual dysfunctions associated with amblyopia. Keywords: Amblyopia, Color Vision, Contrast Sensitivity, Traditional Methods, Binocular Therapy.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Amblyopia on Color Vision and Contrast Sensitivity: A Systematic Review

Tahami Babar,

Rubab naqvi,

Qurba Kiran

et al. 2024

JHRR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A Comparative Study of Manual and Digital Methods and Stereopsis Assessment in Young Adults

Gul e Lala,

Imtiaz,

Ikram

et al. 2023

PJHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reduced stereopsis or depth perception may be the early indicator of abnormal motor functions in people therefore, the stereopsis test is considered ideal for visual screening. It can accomplish the need for the assessment of stereopsis by using a cost-effective smartphone application. Objective: To compare the stereo acuity values of manual and digital stereopsis tests by using the Random Dot Stereo Acuity test with Lea Symbols (Manual) and the SAT App for Android (Digital). Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was carried out in the Eye department at The University of Lahore Teaching Hospital from February 2023 to May 2023. A total of 62 subjects aged 15-35 years were included in our study, out of which 31 were emmetropes and 31 were ametropes. Screening of subjects was done which included torch light examination and basic refraction. Manually stereopsis was measured using Random Dot stereo acuity test with Lea symbols and digitally it was measured by SAT application. Results: The mean ± SD stereo acuity value of the manual test (N=62) was 60.5242 ± 36.47607 seconds of arc and the mean stereo acuity value of the digital test (N=62) was 70.0968 ± 28.29569 seconds of arc. P-value was 0.006 which confirmed that our results were statistically significant. Conclusions: Our study highlighted the comparison of digital and manual stereopsis tests. We obtained different stereo acuity values from both tests on the same individuals. Hence, the manual test gave better values of stereopsis than the digital test.

show abstract

Comparison of the Efficacy of TNO and Titmus Fly in Myopic Anisometropes

Cited by 2 publications

References 9 publications

Effect of Amblyopia on Color Vision and Contrast Sensitivity: A Systematic Review

Effect of Amblyopia on Color Vision and Contrast Sensitivity: A Systematic Review

A Comparative Study of Manual and Digital Methods and Stereopsis Assessment in Young Adults

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About