2012
DOI: 10.5923/j.statistics.20120201.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Efficiency of the Various Algorithms in Stratified Sampling when the Initial Solutions are Determined with Geometric Method

Abstract: The main aim of this paper is to examine the efficiency of Genetic Algorithm (GA) of Keskintürk and Er

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two main directions works on stratification go in, namely stratification as simple as possible though still efficient, and stratification as efficient as possible. For example, Gunning and Horgan (2006) presented a very simple algorithm, called geometric stratification, for the former (recently, Kozak (2011) showed that stratification based on kmeans clustering is more efficient than geometric stratification, and Er (2012) showed that geometric stratification seldom is efficient and often provides strata that are not feasible), while Kozak (2004) and Keskintürk and Er (2007) presented algorithms for the latter. In this paper, the latter problem is dealt with.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are two main directions works on stratification go in, namely stratification as simple as possible though still efficient, and stratification as efficient as possible. For example, Gunning and Horgan (2006) presented a very simple algorithm, called geometric stratification, for the former (recently, Kozak (2011) showed that stratification based on kmeans clustering is more efficient than geometric stratification, and Er (2012) showed that geometric stratification seldom is efficient and often provides strata that are not feasible), while Kozak (2004) and Keskintürk and Er (2007) presented algorithms for the latter. In this paper, the latter problem is dealt with.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The question arises, then, as to which of the two algorithms is more efficient. Recently Er (2012) showed…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For setting optimal stratum boundaries, a variety of statistical procedures have been developed. Commonly used methods to determine stratum boundaries are the cumulative root frequency method [19], and the Lavallée-Hidiroglou iterative method [20] with Kozak's [21] algorithm [22]. The strata boundaries constructed using these methods are listed in Table A1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of built-up land in the 1 km 2 buffer zones around these villages ranged between 1% and 89%, with an overall average of 23%. iterative method [20] with Kozak's [21] algorithm [22]. The strata boundaries constructed using these methods are listed in Table A1.…”
Section: Proportion Of Built-up Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors have implemented comparative studies on allocation methods under particular constraints, among others Er (2012), Kozak (2014), Keto & Pahkinen (2017) and Clark et al (2017). This paper can be framed in this area of research, being its main aim the comparison of allocation methods used in a business survey framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%