2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the efficiency of five suction light traps under field conditions in South Africa for the collection of Culicoides species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
88
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
88
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite being an artificial system and the great variety of factors that can influence light trap results (Nelson and Bellamy, 1971;Murray, 1987;Bellis and Reid, 1996;Garcia-Saenz et al, 2011) it has become a standard tool for the collection of Culicoides midges. In a comparative study in South Africa, the 220 V down-draught Onderstepoort black-light trap was shown to collect significantly more Culicoides midges under field conditions than the Rieb, mini-CDC, Pirbright and BG-sentinel light traps (Venter et al, 2009a). Taking into account the more powerful light source and fan of the 220 V Onderstepoort trap, compared to that of the others, this result was not surprising.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite being an artificial system and the great variety of factors that can influence light trap results (Nelson and Bellamy, 1971;Murray, 1987;Bellis and Reid, 1996;Garcia-Saenz et al, 2011) it has become a standard tool for the collection of Culicoides midges. In a comparative study in South Africa, the 220 V down-draught Onderstepoort black-light trap was shown to collect significantly more Culicoides midges under field conditions than the Rieb, mini-CDC, Pirbright and BG-sentinel light traps (Venter et al, 2009a). Taking into account the more powerful light source and fan of the 220 V Onderstepoort trap, compared to that of the others, this result was not surprising.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Downdraught 220 V Onderstepoort black-light traps (Venter et al, 2009a) The fourth study area was at least 600 m away from the third. Here, the traps were operated in a roofed service area between five camps which housed five to ten horses at night.…”
Section: Collection Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Onderstepoort trap is described in detail by Venter et al, 2009. Each light trap was fitted with white polyester mesh (surface area ±0.07 m 2 ; mesh size 2-3 mm), surrounding the light source. Under normal trapping conditions the purpose of the mesh is to exclude moths and bigger insects from the collections (Goffredo and Meiswinkel, 2004).…”
Section: Test Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimise interference between light traps, the 5 collecting sites were located at least 15 m apart. Light trap operating procedure was conducted as described by Venter et al, 2009. Black or UV light is known to be more effective than white light for the attraction and collection of Culicoides midges (Wieser-Schimpf et al, 1990) including C. imicola (Venter and Hermanides, 2006), the most abundant vector of BTV and AHSV in South Africa. The strong attraction of the black light source renders the Onderstepoort light trap less useful for the evaluation of repellents against Culicoides midges .…”
Section: Test Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%