2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-015-1852-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Fatigue Crack Propagation Behavior of Two Different Forms of PMMA Using Two-Stage Zone Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Equation (2), the equivalent fatigue life, N f(eq) can be written as; where σ a(0) is the reference stress amplitude at which equivalent fatigue life is to be calculated. In past studies on fatigue crack growth rate in bone cement [33-42], values of m were reported to be between 3.60 and 18.20. Therefore, Wilcoxon hypothesis tests were conducted with m values varying between 3.5 and 19.0 for σ a(0) = 15.0 MPa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Equation (2), the equivalent fatigue life, N f(eq) can be written as; where σ a(0) is the reference stress amplitude at which equivalent fatigue life is to be calculated. In past studies on fatigue crack growth rate in bone cement [33-42], values of m were reported to be between 3.60 and 18.20. Therefore, Wilcoxon hypothesis tests were conducted with m values varying between 3.5 and 19.0 for σ a(0) = 15.0 MPa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used the data of five specimens to generate a single regression line described by Paris' law, obtaining a general coefficient of regression of 0.96. Two different PMMAs, rather than PMMA based bone cement, were tested by Hao et al [11] using both compact tension (CT) and middle tension (MT) fracture toughness samples. Using CT samples they found that there was minimal differences between the two cements, but using the MT there was an obvious difference in the gradients of the / versus ∆ graphs, thus indicating difference in the Paris Law equations.…”
Section: Fatigue Crack Growth In Ct Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%