1949
DOI: 10.3109/00365514909065635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Fick and Hamilton Methods for the Determination of Cardiac Output in Man121

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1950
1950
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). 39 40,41 Its errors in measuring the cardiac output are probably no greater than those of the Fick method and, in addition, the volume of blood in the heart, lungs, and great vessels (from the point of injection to the point of sampling) can be calculated from the dye concentration curve by multiplying the mean circulation time by the flow ( fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). 39 40,41 Its errors in measuring the cardiac output are probably no greater than those of the Fick method and, in addition, the volume of blood in the heart, lungs, and great vessels (from the point of injection to the point of sampling) can be calculated from the dye concentration curve by multiplying the mean circulation time by the flow ( fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The injection of T-1824 9 in 0.5 per cent solution and collection of samples from the femoral artery were carried out according to method of Werko and associates (4). Following this the arterial pressure was measured again and additional arterial samples were withdrawn at 10, 15, and 20 minutes for determination of total plasma volume.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After novocainizing the skin and making a small incision through the dermis with a scalpel blade, a 15 gauge Robb type needle 5 cm. in length 4 was inserted into the femoral artery. This permitted excellent flows of 2 to 3 cc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations