2016
DOI: 10.22246/jikm.2016.37.4.645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Functional Recovery of Stroke Patients Treated with Eastern-Western Integrative Medical Care and Western Single Rehabilitation Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study indicated that the main reason for these findings and the differences from the results of the previous study was the recent increase in the use of KM and KM&WM as CT among elderly individuals [ 20 , 21 , 22 ]. Therefore, we investigated the social, policies, economic and scientific causes based on the above research results.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study indicated that the main reason for these findings and the differences from the results of the previous study was the recent increase in the use of KM and KM&WM as CT among elderly individuals [ 20 , 21 , 22 ]. Therefore, we investigated the social, policies, economic and scientific causes based on the above research results.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…However, the limitation of this finding was that it only included consultations for acupuncture medicine. Although the validation of the medical effect of CT in several medical fields is incomplete, the efficacy of Non-HM for disease is gradually being scientifically proven [ 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a numerical scale with three scores per item, and the maximum score for lower limb motor function is 34 ( 21 ). The FAC categorizes gait patterns according to the level of assistance into six stages: a score of zero indicates nonfunctional ambulation, a score of 1 indicates ambulation dependent on physical assistance, a score of 2 indicates ambulation with intermittent help from one assistant, a score of 3 indicates ambulation without physical assistance but with guidance or monitoring, a score of 4 indicates independent ambulation on flat surface but dependent ambulation on steps or uneven surface, and a score of 5 indicates independent ambulation ( 22 ). In this study, the patients were divided into two groups, those with <3-point FAC and those with ≥3-point FAC based on the level of independent ambulation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%