SAE Technical Paper Series 2013
DOI: 10.4271/2013-01-1613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Homogeneous Relaxation Model and a Rayleigh Plesset Cavitation Model in Predicting the Cavitating Flow Through Various Injector Hole Shapes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…E. Winklhofer et al [49] provided a value of CCN = 2.33 for this case, and proved that it depends on the geometry. Nonetheless, based on the results of F. Brusiani et al [7] and the ones presented here, it can be assumed that it also depends on the working fluid. The values obtained by F. Brusiani et al [7] are CCN = 2.4 − 2.5, but for the present study they would be between 3 and 4.…”
Section: D Throttlementioning
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…E. Winklhofer et al [49] provided a value of CCN = 2.33 for this case, and proved that it depends on the geometry. Nonetheless, based on the results of F. Brusiani et al [7] and the ones presented here, it can be assumed that it also depends on the working fluid. The values obtained by F. Brusiani et al [7] are CCN = 2.4 − 2.5, but for the present study they would be between 3 and 4.…”
Section: D Throttlementioning
confidence: 60%
“…The first validation case corresponds to the two-dimensional throttle arrangement developed and tested by E. Winklhofer et al [49]. It has been previously used as validation case by other researches, for example, F. Brusiani et al [7]. Even though they tested three different geometries with three different contraction levels, only one of them with a contraction of 5%, named "throttle U", is selected for validation purposes.…”
Section: D Throttlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations