2021
DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000759384.99186.46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Of The Impact Of Different Language Teaching On Fundamental Physical Fitness: English Vs. Chinese

Abstract: or training monotony (p=0.49) indicating that the HIIT intervention did not impact training load variables. Whilst overall time of the MANLT showed no significant difference between T1(142.8±10.3s) and T2(144.9±8.7s) (p=0.14, r=0.90), BLA3 was significantly lower between T1(7.8±3.2mmol/L) and T2(5.6±2.2mmol/L) (p=0.01, r=0.57). In contrast, overall time of the MANLT from T2(144.9±8.7s) to T3(141.9±8.6s) demonstrated significant improvements (p=0.001, r=0.957) and BLA3 response following HIIT was also significa… Show more

Help me understand this report

This publication either has no citations yet, or we are still processing them

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?

See others like this or search for similar articles