Comparison of the Indicators of Psychological Stress in the Population of Hubei Province and Non-Endemic Provinces in China During Two Weeks During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in February 2020

Abstract

Background:During February 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic in Hubei Province, China, was at its height, requiring isolation of the population. This study aimed to compare the emotional state, somatic responses, sleep quality, and behavior of people in Hubei Province with non-endemic provinces in China during two weeks in February 2020. Material/Methods:Questionnaires were completed by 939 individuals (357 men; 582 women), including 33 from Hubei and 906 from non-endemic provinces. The Stress Response Questionnaire (SRQ) determined the emotional state, somatic responses, and behavior. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was used to measure the duration of sleep and sleep quality. Results:There were 939 study participants, aged 18 -24 years (35.89%) and 25 -39 years (35.57%); 65.92% were university students. During a two week period in February 2020, the emotional state and behavior of participants in Hubei improved, but the quality of sleep did not. Health workers and business people became increasingly anxious, but other professionals became less anxious. The data showed that most people in Hubei Province developed a more positive attitude regarding their risk of infection and the chances of surviving the COVID-19 epidemic. Conclusions:During a two-week period, front-line health workers and people in Hubei Province became less anxious about the COVID-19 epidemic, but sleep quality did not improve. Despite public awareness, levels of anxiety exist that affect the quality of life during epidemics, including periods of population quarantine. Therefore, health education should be combined with psychological counseling for vulnerable individuals.

Mental burden and its risk and protective factors during the early phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: systematic review and meta-analyses

“…Thus, the mean age of participants in the pandemic studies ranged from 20 (SD not reported) to 56.9 (SD 7.6) years [ 49 , 99 ] 1 . The studies covered Asia (67 studies [ 26 , 41 – 43 , 49 , 50 , 54 , 57 , 58 , 60 , 62 , 64 , 71 , 74 , 76 , 80 , 81 , 85 , 86 , 88 – 91 , 93 , 98 , 101 , 102 , 104 , 109 , 111 – 116 , 118 – 123 , 126 , 124 , 128 , 131 – 133 , 136 , 137 , 140 , 141 , 143 , 145 ] 1 [ 18 , 48 , 59 , 73 , 84 , 87 , 92 , 100 , 105 , 106 , 108 , 117 , 134 , 138 , 139 , 142 , 144 ] 1,2 [ 127 ] 1, 3 ) thereof from China [ 42 , 49 , 50 , 57 , 58 , 60 , 62 , 64 ,…”

The mental health impact of the covid-19 pandemic on healthcare workers, and interventions to help them: a rapid systematic review

“…Yuan et al 27 also administered a survey twice to 939 respondents during the pandemic (in February 2020), with two weeks between the surveys, and no attrition reported. Each respondent answered the same questions: “ I feel worried, I feel anxious, fidgeting and not knowing what to do, I feel frightened, I feel nervous and uneasy, I don’t think I can succeed even if I try hard , and I’ve been smoking or drinking a lot lately .” The authors presented the changes per item after two weeks, rather than answers at both time points, and the answer scale was not reported.…”

Effect of COVID-19 Quarantine on the Sleep Quality and the Depressive Symptom Levels of University Students in Jordan During the Spring of 2020

“…57.1% of Italians who participated in an online questionnaire suffered from decreased sleep quality ( 21 ). Moreover, during the 2 weeks of quarantine in February in China, the sleeping disorders were significantly increased in the age group of 18–24 years ( 22 ). Likewise, a study in Greece showed that although the quantity of sleeping hours increased in 66.3% of the study participants, the sleep quality decreases to 43% ( 23 ).…”