2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Insall-Burstein II and NexGen Legacy Total Knee Arthroplasty Systems with Respect to Patella Complications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This system also is unique in that the tibial component uses four short pegs for fixation (as opposed to a keel or stem) and the cemented tibial and femoral components are precoated with polymethylmethacrylate (as were the cemented versions of the MGI and MGII) in an attempt to enhance component fixation. Some midterm reports suggest improved survival of this device relative to earlier implant designs [9,22,25,28,30]. The study by Bozic et al also confirmed high survivorship of this design at a mean 5.8 years postoperatively [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…This system also is unique in that the tibial component uses four short pegs for fixation (as opposed to a keel or stem) and the cemented tibial and femoral components are precoated with polymethylmethacrylate (as were the cemented versions of the MGI and MGII) in an attempt to enhance component fixation. Some midterm reports suggest improved survival of this device relative to earlier implant designs [9,22,25,28,30]. The study by Bozic et al also confirmed high survivorship of this design at a mean 5.8 years postoperatively [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…An important role in patellar tracking is played by the prosthetic design; in the present study, the femoral component presents a trochlear groove designed to sweep back posteriorly for better patellar performance. The trochlear floor has been widened to reduce the constraining forces in extension [10, 11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neben der Analyse der Patellaform präoperativ, ist die Dickenmessung des Resektats an verschiedenen Zonen relevant, um das Problem zu lösen. Bei der Positionierung der Patellakomponente sollte eine laterale Position in jedem Fall vermieden werden, es wird die zentrale oder leicht medialisierte Position empfohlen [24,25].…”
Section: Patellare Ursacheunclassified