2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the interannual variability of spring heavy floods characteristics of tributaries of the St. Lawrence River in Quebec (Canada)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, this method is sensitive to small changes in mean and variance, unlike other tests [16]. Because the Lombard test equations have been presented in several papers (e.g., [16][17][18]), they are not described herein. According to this test, at the 95% confidence interval, one concludes that the mean or variance of the series changes significantly whenever S n > 0.0403.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, this method is sensitive to small changes in mean and variance, unlike other tests [16]. Because the Lombard test equations have been presented in several papers (e.g., [16][17][18]), they are not described herein. According to this test, at the 95% confidence interval, one concludes that the mean or variance of the series changes significantly whenever S n > 0.0403.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method has been described in some of our previous work (e.g., [18,20]). The dependence in a random vector (X, Y) is contained in its corresponding copula function C. Specifically, the theorem of Sklar ensures that there exists a unique C :…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have explored the correlation of a wide range of indices with hydro-climate indicators for North American and Canada-wide influences (Rood et al 2005;Gobena and Gan 2006;Bonsal and Shabbar 2008), and for various regions (Coulibaly et al 2000;Déry and Wood 2005;Fleming et al 2007;Woo and Thorne 2008) and specific watersheds in western, northern and eastern Canada (Burn 2008;Brabets and Walvoord 2009;Thorne and Woo 2011;Déry et al 2012;Mazouz et al 2012;Peters et al 2013). A range of hydro-climate indicators, at different temporal scales, were used, including: snow cover (Brown and Goodison 1996), snow water equivalent (Hamlet et al 2005), nival and glacier-influenced streamflow (Fleming et al 2006), annual streamflow (Anctil and Coulibaly 2004;Déry et al 2012), seasonal streamflow (Coulibaly and Burn 2005) and low-flow and high flow extremes (Ehsanzadeh and Adamowski 2008;Khaliq et al 2008;Assani et al 2010Assani et al , 2012.…”
Section: Hydrology-based Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multi-dimensional aspect of this study is essential since most spring floods are consequences of multiple cumulative and simultaneous events/conditions, including primarily snowmelt conditions. The severity of spring floods in North-East America depends mainly on the rate of snowmelt and the snow accumulation from the previous winter, but intense spring rainfall events may also amplify the phenomenon (Lawford et al 1995;Turcotte et al 2010;Villarini et al 2011;Mazouz et al 2012). Such meteorological events can be quantified using indicators developed by the Expert Team on Climate Change Detection Monitoring and Indices (ETCCDMI) and/or by the STAtistical and Regional dynamical Downscaling of EXtremes for European regions project (STARDEX), which were used in previous studies in eastern Canada in Gachon et al (2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%