2006
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)00243-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Long-Term Outcomes Between Incontinent Men and Women Treated With Artificial Urinary Sphincter

Abstract: There were no differences in overall satisfactory continence and device failure rates. However, women have a higher dry rate (0 pad use) and longer functioning device duration compared to their male counterparts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
33
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
8
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The criteria used in the studies with AUS to define continence were represented in Table 2. Discrepancies exist in the definition of continence reported in the main series [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. Furthermore, subjective outcomes were rarely reported.…”
Section: Ausmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The criteria used in the studies with AUS to define continence were represented in Table 2. Discrepancies exist in the definition of continence reported in the main series [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. Furthermore, subjective outcomes were rarely reported.…”
Section: Ausmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validated quality of life questionnaires were never used. Only subjective improvement assessed by asking the patients was sometimes reported [34,36,38,43]. Sexual function was never investigated.…”
Section: Ausmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, tissue atrophy is probably the most common cause of non-mechanical failure and also the most common cause for AUS revision [4,7,9]. Since 1987, the incidence of tissue atrophy has decreased considerably with the introduction of a narrow-backed cuff [2,3].…”
Section: Tissue Atrophymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, there is an abundance of literature on patient selection, surgical techniques and clinical outcomes in AUS implantation [3][4][5][6][7]. However, there is a lack of information pertaining to the postoperative evaluation and management in patients with AUS implant who complain and continue to have UI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, the de fi nitions of continence, improvement in urinary control, model of sphincter, indications (radical vs. transurethral prostatectomy), and patient satisfaction vary widely [ 244 ] . Signi fi cant improvements in urinary control may be as high as 87 % in the short term [ 245,246 ] and may persist up to 10 years indicating the durability of the procedure [ 198,200,247 ] . In one study, 90 % of patients had a functional AUS at 5 years with nearly threequarters requiring no revision [ 201 ] .…”
Section: Arti Fi Cial Urinary Sphinctermentioning
confidence: 99%