2012
DOI: 10.1190/geo2011-0145.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the low-frequency variations of the vertical and horizontal components of the electric background field at the sea bottom

Abstract: Natural electric field variations are measured at the sea bottom over long periods of time by means of stationary, vertical, and horizontal galvanic antennas. We compare the power spectra of the vertical and horizontal field components and the extent to which they may be reduced by standard averaging techniques. Although the raw spectra of the vertical and horizontal components do not differ greatly, the difference in the spectra after averaging is significantly greater. Most significantly, in the frequency ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(a) Layered model, (b) voltage decay, and (c) anomalous effects of the thin resistive layer. L = 1000 m, R = 1414 m, total current I CED = I VEL = 1000 A, and offset is 2000 m. Evaluation of the external noise in electric field components is given in (Constable ; Flekkøy, Haland and Maløy ). The vertical arrow indicates the time at which the responses reach the CED/VEL moment‐normalised threshold noise 1E‐15 V/A/m/m.…”
Section: Circular Electric Dipole and Vertical Electric Dipolementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) Layered model, (b) voltage decay, and (c) anomalous effects of the thin resistive layer. L = 1000 m, R = 1414 m, total current I CED = I VEL = 1000 A, and offset is 2000 m. Evaluation of the external noise in electric field components is given in (Constable ; Flekkøy, Haland and Maløy ). The vertical arrow indicates the time at which the responses reach the CED/VEL moment‐normalised threshold noise 1E‐15 V/A/m/m.…”
Section: Circular Electric Dipole and Vertical Electric Dipolementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation of the external noise in vertical and horizontal electric field components is given by Flekkøy et al (2012). The results obtained after processing experimental data measured at a sea depth of 120 m -300 m with a maximum deviation of the receiving dipoles from vertical of ϕ < 0.1°indicate that the energy spectrum of the field component E z in the range of periods 2-20 s is less than 10 −19 V 2 /m 2 s (i.e., at period of 10 s, the noise amplitude does not exceed ß10 −9 V/m).…”
Section: E V a L U A T I O N O F N O I S Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vertical dotted lines indicate the time at which the responses reach the VEB moment-normalized threshold noise 10 −15 V/Am 2(Constable 2010;Flekkøy et al 2012). Sea depth H w = 1 km, ρ = 0.33 Ωm, and offset R = 1 km.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to break through the limitation that the CSAMT method can only be observed in the far-field zone, He et al ( 2014He et al ( , 2015 proposed to observe only the Ex field instead of Cagniard apparent resistivity, which can reduces the offset and enhance sensitivity verified by the results of numerical simulation and field observation, and is successfully applied in shale gas exploration ( Yuan et al, 2017). Some scholars are employing vertical electric source to obtain the response of deep resistive targets (Holten et al, 2009;Flekkøy et al, 2012;Um, 2012;Tietze et al, 2019 ). The above studies mostly obtained conclusions by directly studying electromagnetic fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%