2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the methods for measuring the Ki-67 labeling index in adrenocortical carcinoma: manual versus digital image analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all cohorts in this multicentre study, the high agreement of distinction between low, intermediate, and high density of cells was confirmed. Many new automatic methods were described and a concordance with manual methods was shown [ 24 27 ]. Our study also confirmed this concordance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all cohorts in this multicentre study, the high agreement of distinction between low, intermediate, and high density of cells was confirmed. Many new automatic methods were described and a concordance with manual methods was shown [ 24 27 ]. Our study also confirmed this concordance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the Ki67 index was superior to mitotic count (irrespective of method of estimation) in the prognostic stratification of adrenocortical carcinomas for overall survival . A study comparing methods for measuring Ki67 proliferation indices in 18 adrenocortical carcinomas by seven pathologists using microscopes (manual analysis) and digital image analysis and by selecting ‘hotspots’ and ‘average’ indices found that digital image analysis significantly correlated with manual analysis in hotspots but not in the average fields . The hotspots had significantly and consistently higher Ki67 indices than the average areas by both methods .…”
Section: Proliferative Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study comparing methods for measuring Ki67 proliferation indices in 18 adrenocortical carcinomas by seven pathologists using microscopes (manual analysis) and digital image analysis and by selecting ‘hotspots’ and ‘average’ indices found that digital image analysis significantly correlated with manual analysis in hotspots but not in the average fields . The hotspots had significantly and consistently higher Ki67 indices than the average areas by both methods . Patients with carcinomas with Ki67 indices <10% had significantly better outcomes than those with Ki67 indices >10% by manual analysis in hotspots.…”
Section: Proliferative Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Ki-67 labeling index (LI) was determined according to the counting method de ned by WHO in 2017 [25], using the HALO image analysis software (Indica Laboratories, Corrales, New Mexico, USA) with the CytoNuclear IHC v1.6 algorithm module. We performed imaging analysis, according to a previously reported study using this digital data to obtain the Ki-67 LI [26]. We analyzed nuclear immunoreactivity according to the gradients of brown color (3,3-diaminobenzidine [DAB]) spectrum intensity.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Ki-67 Labeling Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%