2005
DOI: 10.1163/1568569053750055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the mobilization and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation methods in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourteen studies [1][2][3]5,6,10,11,27,28,35,37,[42][43][44] used a visual analog scale (VAS) or a numeric pain-rating scale to measure a variety of pain-related outcomes. Nine trials 4,5,10,22,27,28,42,44,52 used validated functional outcome measures.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Fourteen studies [1][2][3]5,6,10,11,27,28,35,37,[42][43][44] used a visual analog scale (VAS) or a numeric pain-rating scale to measure a variety of pain-related outcomes. Nine trials 4,5,10,22,27,28,42,44,52 used validated functional outcome measures.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nine trials 4,5,10,22,27,28,42,44,52 used validated functional outcome measures. Shoulder ac- Group 1 (n = 7): MT (anterior, posterior, inferior mobilization or traction of the GH joint) and standard care Group 2 (n = 7): standard care (hot packs, active ROM, stretching and strengthening shoulder exercises, soft tissue mobilization, and patient education)…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations