2006
DOI: 10.1345/aph.1g635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Cockcroft–Gault Equations for Antimicrobial Dosage Adjustments

Abstract: This analysis demonstrated statistically significant differences between the CG and MDRD equations, resulting in different dosing recommendations in 21-37% of patients. The clinical significance of these differences is uncertain in the absence of data regarding clinical outcomes that would result from the use of the discordant doses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
55
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
6
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Although these equations have limitations, both the CG and MDRD equations have been shown to correlate relatively well with measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR), 22 but differences in medication dose recommendations have been reported depending on which equation is used. [23][24][25] An analysis of the Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) registry was conducted to compare the CG and MDRD equations with regard to the recommended doses of eptifibatide, tirofiban, and enoxaparin. 23 Results of this analysis showed a 20% difference in CKD classification between the 2 equations.…”
Section: Methods Of Estimating Renal Function For Drug Dosingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Although these equations have limitations, both the CG and MDRD equations have been shown to correlate relatively well with measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR), 22 but differences in medication dose recommendations have been reported depending on which equation is used. [23][24][25] An analysis of the Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) registry was conducted to compare the CG and MDRD equations with regard to the recommended doses of eptifibatide, tirofiban, and enoxaparin. 23 Results of this analysis showed a 20% difference in CKD classification between the 2 equations.…”
Section: Methods Of Estimating Renal Function For Drug Dosingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toutes ces é tudes sont cependant des simulations et nous en ré sumons les principales dans le Tableau 2 [49,50,52,[54][55][56][57][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84]. À la vue de ce tableau, le moins que l'on puisse dire est que les é tudes ne sont pas toujours d'une qualité mé thodologique irré prochable (notamment en termes de « cré atinine »), que les mé thodologies et les simulations sont parfois assez diffé rentes, et enfin que les ré sultats de ces publications, en termes du choix de la formule, sont trè s contradictoires.…”
Section: Le Choix De La Formule : Que Nous Dit La Litte´rature ?unclassified
“…Estos resultados concuerdan con los de varios estudios retrospectivos realizados en má s de 20.000 pacientes con enfermedad renal cró nica, en los que se indicó que el uso de la ecuació n MDRD sobrestima el aclaramiento de creatinina, lo cual conduce a emplear dosis de medicació n significativamente superiores a las calculadas con la ecuació n de CG 13,14,31,32 . La falta de un ajuste renal apropiado de la posología de los NACO puede conducir a eventos adversos graves, por lo que los resultados de este estudio pueden tener trascendencia clínica.…”
Section: Discusió Nunclassified