1984
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90019-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the multivariate analysis and CADENZA systems for determination of the probability of coronary artery disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although test sensitivity did drop from 91 to 73%, the overall correct classification rate rose from 58 to 90%. These results compare favorably with several other re ports [12][13][14][15][16][17][19][20][21][22] of improved diagnostic accuracy of ETT in women using multivariate analysis. As methodol ogy can vary considerably, several aspects of this study should be appreciated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Although test sensitivity did drop from 91 to 73%, the overall correct classification rate rose from 58 to 90%. These results compare favorably with several other re ports [12][13][14][15][16][17][19][20][21][22] of improved diagnostic accuracy of ETT in women using multivariate analysis. As methodol ogy can vary considerably, several aspects of this study should be appreciated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Although such an estimate can be derived from readily available population-based data such as the Framingham models and other published summaries [13][14][15]20 that were provided to the CEPP as background information, the utility of making the estimate is less clear. To the extent that such an estimate of future risk reflects only the natural history of a disease such as CAD, without taking into consideration possible actions that might alter that risk, that estimate can only be seen as a reference value rather than a reliable predictor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical chemical variables have so far not been used as parameters in mathematical models to predict acute myocardial infarction. Some, mainly total cholesterol and glucose, were employed in predictive models for chronic coronary artery disease [18,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Others, such as maximum levels of cardiospecific enzymes, were used for stratifying the individual risk of patients for adverse events following myocardial infarction [33] and blood glucose in diabetics in early risk stratification of patients with acute myocardial infarction [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%