2022
DOI: 10.1177/09544100221107726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Newton–Raphson Method and genetic algorithm solutions for nonlinear aircraft trim analysis

Abstract: As the number of unknowns in trim analysis increases, the problem becomes more complicated, and traditional methods begin to fail. Common problems with conventional methods may be an ill-conditioned matrix, rounding errors, and division by zero. Furthermore, these methods are likely to find the local optimum, not the global optimum. In such cases, hybrid use with intelligent methods such as genetic algorithms is recommended. In this study, a flight situation that the Newton–Raphson method has for difficulty in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining appropriate control surface deflections and aircraft states to allow the aircraft to carry out the specified flight task can be a definition of trimming an aircraft [32]. The aircraft trim problem has been solved using an optimization approach for years and is still discussed with various optimization methods as well as under different flight circumstances [33][34][35][36][37]. However, the stick-free level flight trim algorithm has been never discussed, and no open public study exists.…”
Section: Stick-free Level Flight Trim Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining appropriate control surface deflections and aircraft states to allow the aircraft to carry out the specified flight task can be a definition of trimming an aircraft [32]. The aircraft trim problem has been solved using an optimization approach for years and is still discussed with various optimization methods as well as under different flight circumstances [33][34][35][36][37]. However, the stick-free level flight trim algorithm has been never discussed, and no open public study exists.…”
Section: Stick-free Level Flight Trim Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%