2019
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00305-19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Novel Immunocatch Legionella Test with Sofia Legionella FIA Assay and with BinaxNOW Legionella Card Assay for Detection of Legionella pneumophila (Serogroup 1) Antigen in Urine Samples

Abstract: Legionnaires' disease (LD) refers to a serious form of acute pneumonia caused by Legionella species. LD can be difficult to diagnose because the signs and symptoms are nonspecific, and therefore a rapid laboratory diagnosis is of paramount importance. In this study, a recently introduced immunochromatographic test (Immunocatch Legionella; Eiken Chemical Co., Ltd.) for Legionella pneumophila (serogroup 1) urinary antigen detection was compared with the Sofia Legionella fluorescent immunoassay (FIA) (Quidel) (ro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity of the ICT assays for both the Immunocatch TM LUAT ICT test and the commercially available competitor, BinaxNOW ® LUAT ICT test (Alere Inc., USA) for the Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 was 80%, and the specificity was 97% with a 98% overall agreement between the two tests. Comparison between the ICT assays and the urine EIA test showed 98% overall agreement and a specificity of 100% ( 33 35 ). This discovery has allowed a five-day reduction for the delay between the onset of illness and notification, as well as facilitated decreasing mortality trends in developed nations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The sensitivity of the ICT assays for both the Immunocatch TM LUAT ICT test and the commercially available competitor, BinaxNOW ® LUAT ICT test (Alere Inc., USA) for the Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 was 80%, and the specificity was 97% with a 98% overall agreement between the two tests. Comparison between the ICT assays and the urine EIA test showed 98% overall agreement and a specificity of 100% ( 33 35 ). This discovery has allowed a five-day reduction for the delay between the onset of illness and notification, as well as facilitated decreasing mortality trends in developed nations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%