2013
DOI: 10.1186/1749-8090-8-70
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the novel Medtentia double helix mitral annuloplasty system with the Carpentier-Edwards Physio annuloplasty ring: morphological and functional long-term outcome in a mitral valve insufficiency sheep model

Abstract: BackgroundThe prevalence of mitral regurgitation in cardiac diseases requires annuloplasty systems that can be implanted without excessive patient burden. This study was designed to examine the morphological and functional outcome of a new double helix mitral annuloplasty ring in an ovine model in comparison to the classical Carpentier-Edwards (CE) annuloplasty ring as measured by reduction of mitral regurgitation and tissue integration. The Medtentia annuloplasty ring (MAR) is a helical device that is rotated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Pubmed search of the available literature over the last 10 years in June 2019, the keywords “annuloplasty, mitral, ring, comparison” resulted in a total of 41 references, of which seven actually presented a comparison of at least two different rings (1 animal model [ 11 ], 2 restricted to ischemic etiology [ 12 14 ] and 4 which did not specify the etiology [ 15 , 16 ] as well as one computer-based modelling study [ 17 ]). The majority of these did not report on long-term functional and survival benefits, but focused on short-term hemodynamic results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Pubmed search of the available literature over the last 10 years in June 2019, the keywords “annuloplasty, mitral, ring, comparison” resulted in a total of 41 references, of which seven actually presented a comparison of at least two different rings (1 animal model [ 11 ], 2 restricted to ischemic etiology [ 12 14 ] and 4 which did not specify the etiology [ 15 , 16 ] as well as one computer-based modelling study [ 17 ]). The majority of these did not report on long-term functional and survival benefits, but focused on short-term hemodynamic results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%