2020
DOI: 10.3390/foods9060748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Novel Thin Film-Solid Phase Microextraction and Sorptive Extraction Methods for Picual and Hojiblanca Olive Oil Volatile Fraction Analysis in Headspace

Abstract: For first time, the new device named thin film solid phase microextraction (TF-SPME) has been used to determine the volatile profile of the Picual and Hojiblanca varieties of extra virgin olive oils. To this end, different traditional sampling methods such as headspace sorptive extraction (HSSE) with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and polyethyleneglycol-modified silicone (EG/Silicone) Twisters® have been compared with the TF-SPME devices coated with different extraction polymeric phases. PARADISe software was use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…128 In another study, SPME with two new thin film (TF-SPME) devices with a larger surface of extracting phase than typical HS-SPME gave better results than HSSE with PDMS Twister and polyethylenglicol-modified silicone (EG/S) Twister, even if currently the former has a higher price. 139 A comparison of these devices with the typically used HS-SPME fibers would be appropriate to confirm their suitability. Application of the vacuum-assisted HS-SPME (vac-HS-SPME) allowed revealing that the positive effect of reduced pressure on sampling is limited for the most volatile compounds, while for all the other VOCs, a nongeneralizable compound-dependent behavior related to the applied sampling time and temperature was observed.…”
Section: Analytical Issues and Approaches Formentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…128 In another study, SPME with two new thin film (TF-SPME) devices with a larger surface of extracting phase than typical HS-SPME gave better results than HSSE with PDMS Twister and polyethylenglicol-modified silicone (EG/S) Twister, even if currently the former has a higher price. 139 A comparison of these devices with the typically used HS-SPME fibers would be appropriate to confirm their suitability. Application of the vacuum-assisted HS-SPME (vac-HS-SPME) allowed revealing that the positive effect of reduced pressure on sampling is limited for the most volatile compounds, while for all the other VOCs, a nongeneralizable compound-dependent behavior related to the applied sampling time and temperature was observed.…”
Section: Analytical Issues and Approaches Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same study, the authors compared three different SHS methods (namely, HS-SPME, headspace sorptive extraction (HSSE), and monoliting material sorptive extraction (MMSE), which differ in the sorptive/adsorptive materials’ characteristics and amount) and the DHS sampling approaches: a nongeneralizable compound-dependent behavior was highlighted, with a different best technique for each class of VOCs . In another study, SPME with two new thin film (TF-SPME) devices with a larger surface of extracting phase than typical HS-SPME gave better results than HSSE with PDMS Twister and polyethylenglicol-modified silicone (EG/S) Twister, even if currently the former has a higher price . A comparison of these devices with the typically used HS-SPME fibers would be appropriate to confirm their suitability.…”
Section: Analytical Issues and Approaches For Analysis Of Virgin Oliv...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the complexity of positive attributes found in EVOO associated to different volatile profiles rather than single volatile markers, the study of different isolation/extraction techniques and methods are needed to obtain the maximum information of the volatile profile. The perfection and validation of some methods based on headspace-solid-phase micro-extraction (HS-SPME) and gas chromatography (GC) with flame ionization (FID) or mass spectrometry (MS) detectors (Aparicio-Ruiz et al, 2018;Aparicio et al, 2012;Benelli et al, 2015;Casadei et al, 2021;Cecchi et al, 2019;Morales et al, 2005;Oliver-Pozo et al, 2015;Segura-Borrego et al, 2020) also provide the opportunity to determine volatile compounds with a minimized analytical error. The influence of the specificity of the SPME polymer in the volatile adsorption (Oliver-Pozo et al, 2015) could be avoided by using other extraction techniques such as the thermal extraction in micro-vials (ATEX) by Thermal Desorption Unit (TDU) coupled to GC-MS with a previous cryo-concentration with a Cooling Injector System (CIS) that applies liquid nitrogen (Francesca et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%