2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12541-011-0114-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the numerical and experimental results of the sheet metal flange forming based on shell-elements types

Abstract: Flanging is a common sheet metal forming operation to produce structural sheet metal components. Flanging is used to give a component smooth rounded edge, and to provide jointing and assembling of components. In this paper, the simulation and experimental results of two types of z-flanging are investigated. First, a z-flange forming which incorporates mating drawbeads on the main and backup punches is studied. Drawbeads are used in commercial stretch flange operations to control or limit the rate of cut-out ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FE simulation results in terms of punch load, thickness variation, and finished shape were compared with experimental results. Vafaeesefat and Khanahmadlu [14] investigated forming of two types of Z-flange, one performed on a circular blank with an inner hole and another one was a simple stretch forming by a single punch to expand a cut-out blank. Riadh Bahloul [15] optimized the process parameters and minimization of stresses and Lemaitre damage in flanging process using numerical simulation and ductile damage model of Lemaitre.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…FE simulation results in terms of punch load, thickness variation, and finished shape were compared with experimental results. Vafaeesefat and Khanahmadlu [14] investigated forming of two types of Z-flange, one performed on a circular blank with an inner hole and another one was a simple stretch forming by a single punch to expand a cut-out blank. Riadh Bahloul [15] optimized the process parameters and minimization of stresses and Lemaitre damage in flanging process using numerical simulation and ductile damage model of Lemaitre.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steel, copper and aluminium specimen were used to perform the tensile test experiments and to compare the FEM results in terms ductile fracture strain at various fracture location. It can be summarise from the literature review that in stretch flanging process [14,[37][38][39] deformation behaviour of sheet and fracture in sheet have been widely investigated considering various parameters such as material parameters [1,17,23], geometrical parameters [1,4,11,13,16,23,26,31,37,40,41], blank holding force [7,31], friction coefficient [7,23,26,31,42]. Different punch shape has also been used in other sheet metal forming processes such as stretch, shrink, hole flanging and deep drawing process [2, 27-29, 33, 35, 36, 41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sartkulvanich et al [24] developed the FEM model for the characterization of blank edge quality for different punch/die clearance of advanced high-strength steel (AHSS) in stretch flanging process. Vafaeesefat Abbas and Khanahmadlu Morteza [25] compared the FEM simulation with experimental results in terms of shell-element in stretch z-flange-forming process. Golovashchenko [26] improved the quality of trimming process in stretch flanging of aluminum alloys AA6111-T4 sheet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flanging process is always studied by regarding the plate as a sheet, thus the research can focus on the neutral surface and ignore the thickness. The shell element adopted in FE modeling can describe the deformation characteristic during hole flanging with thin sheets [19]. However, this method is not proper for the thick plate, especially the thick cylinder, since the shape is influenced by the deformation along the thickness direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%