“…It has been the focus of well-rounded research and conservation activity in-and ex-situ (Adams et al, 2014;Tapley et al, 2014). Outputs include description and quantification of population trends (Hudson et al, 2016a), disease dynamics and mitigation (Hudson et al, 2016b;Hudson et al, 2019), translocation attempts in the field (Adams et al, 2014), local cultural associations (Nicholson et al, 2020), life history and reproductive data (Gibson et al, 2004), the development of field methods, captive husbandry protocols (Nicholson et al, 2017;Jameson et al, 2019) and the empirical quantification of some of the requirements of this species in captivity from captive populations (Tapley et al, 2015b;Jayson et al, 2018a;. Importantly, these data streams have been derived from co-ordinated approaches between captive and field components, in line with the One Plan Approach of the IUCN Conservation Planning Specialist Group; however, there is much work to be done to optimise captive husbandry protocols.…”