2019
DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2019.1701204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the ongoing pregnancy rate of in vitro fertilisation following tubal occlusion by microcoil placement versus laparoscopic tubal ligation for hydrosalpinges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proximal tubal occlusion with Essure® devices placed hysteroscopically can be considered for specific cases of distorted pelvic anatomy or pelvic adhesions. However, low clinical pregnancy and live birth rates have been reported from the use of tubal occlusion devices [ 10 ]. Salpingostomy was thought to have the advantage of being less invasive and safer than salpingectomy while allowing the woman to attempt natural conception.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proximal tubal occlusion with Essure® devices placed hysteroscopically can be considered for specific cases of distorted pelvic anatomy or pelvic adhesions. However, low clinical pregnancy and live birth rates have been reported from the use of tubal occlusion devices [ 10 ]. Salpingostomy was thought to have the advantage of being less invasive and safer than salpingectomy while allowing the woman to attempt natural conception.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During laparoscopy, tubal ligation was performed by bipolar diathermy applied at 1 to 1.5 cm away from the corneal section of the fallopian tube. Distal fenestration of the fallopian tube was carried out to release the fluid inside [ 10 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study has shown that the procedure of salpingectomy is considered to have a negative effect on AMH levels but not on the number of oocytes retrieved 26 . Chen study compared ovarian reserve levels before and after tubal occlusion and concluded that there was no significant difference in ovarian reserve 27 . However, the electrocauterization procedure during salpingectomy is considered to potentially damage periovarian vascular perfusion.…”
Section: Pto Vs Salpingectomymentioning
confidence: 99%