2023
DOI: 10.6087/kcse.297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the open access status and metrics of Scopus journals published in East Asian countries: a descriptive study

Abstract: Purpose: The objective of this study was to compare Scopus journals published in East Asian countries—China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan—in terms of their open access status and metrics and to explore the implications of those findings for South Korea.Methods: To conduct this study, we selected four East Asian countries: China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. We used journal information provided by SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) and Scopus. The following parameters were analyzed for journals published in East A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a bibliometric study, Jokic et al [14] used the number of years covered in Scopus as a proxy for journal age. Kim and Jeong [15] compared Scopus journals published in East Asian countries (China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan) with the number of years covered in Scopus. The authors found that the median number of years covered by the SJR was highest for Japanese journals and lowest for South Korean journals.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a bibliometric study, Jokic et al [14] used the number of years covered in Scopus as a proxy for journal age. Kim and Jeong [15] compared Scopus journals published in East Asian countries (China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan) with the number of years covered in Scopus. The authors found that the median number of years covered by the SJR was highest for Japanese journals and lowest for South Korean journals.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%