2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2020.102943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Ovako Working Posture Analysis System, Rapid Upper Limb Assessment, and Rapid Entire Body Assessment based on the maximum holding times

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Many previous studies have summarized and compared the three techniques, based on their general characteristics including correspondence with a valid reference, scales for posture classification, main functions, association with MSDs, intra- and inter-observer repeatability/reliability, potential users, and exposure factors assessed such as postures or body regions, load/force, and movement frequency [ 5 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 19 , 20 ]. Some studies compared the three methods based on their assessment results [ 12 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ], and the relationship between the epidemiological data or subjective symptoms of MSDs and assessment results or scores [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous studies have summarized and compared the three techniques, based on their general characteristics including correspondence with a valid reference, scales for posture classification, main functions, association with MSDs, intra- and inter-observer repeatability/reliability, potential users, and exposure factors assessed such as postures or body regions, load/force, and movement frequency [ 5 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 19 , 20 ]. Some studies compared the three methods based on their assessment results [ 12 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ], and the relationship between the epidemiological data or subjective symptoms of MSDs and assessment results or scores [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the working postures have been identified, the effects on the musculoskeletal system by the postural load are then evaluated. The OWAS action category is an ordinal scale but is applied to quantitative statistical analysis assuming an interval scale as with the RULA grand and REBA scores for comparing the three techniques (Kee et al, 2020). OWAS by evaluating posture divided into 4 segments, namely back, arm, leg, and weight load.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OWAS was designed to be easy to use and is therefore accessible to ergonomically untrained personnel. Even though it uses a simplified sampling technique, OWAS provides reliable and valid results (Brandl et al, 2017;Kee et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of RULA and REBA assessment made the analysis of work posture are easy and reliable. Moreover, Kee et al (2020) stated in their research that RULA is the best technique that could be used for assessing the working posture. On the other hand, some of the research also highlighted the use of this method if it will be used alone or combined it with other method.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%