2017
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the paediatric blade of the Pentax-AWS and Ovassapian airway in fibreoptic tracheal intubation in patients with limited mouth opening and cervical spine immobilization by a semi-rigid neck collar: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract: NCT02827110.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 4 Among them, the Ovassapian airway (Teleflex Inc.) ( Figure 1 ), the Williams airway (SunMed Inc.), and the Berman airway (Vital Signs) are widely studied as typical devices. 3 , 5 , 6 In terms of the difference in structure, the distally curved portion of the Williams airway and Ovassapian airway 9 has no anterior and posterior walls, respectively. Conversely, the Berman airway has both walls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 4 Among them, the Ovassapian airway (Teleflex Inc.) ( Figure 1 ), the Williams airway (SunMed Inc.), and the Berman airway (Vital Signs) are widely studied as typical devices. 3 , 5 , 6 In terms of the difference in structure, the distally curved portion of the Williams airway and Ovassapian airway 9 has no anterior and posterior walls, respectively. Conversely, the Berman airway has both walls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 4 Among them, the Ovassapian airway (Teleflex Inc., NC, USA) ( Figure 1 ), the Williams airway (SunMed Inc., MI, USA), and the Berman airway (Vital Signs, NJ, USA) are widely studied as typical devices. 3 , 5 , 6 However, there is limited information of comparisons in severe difficult intubation cases. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, the Ovassapian airway, which has been the standard intubating airway, is no longer being sold in Japan as of 2021.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample size calculation was based on the hypothesis that intubation time in group L is not inferior to that in group S. Using a non-inferiority margin of 10 s, based on the ndings of previous research, [16,17] the minimum sample size was calculated to be 80 patients to achieve a power of 80% and a 2.5% risk of a type I error (one-side test). Non-inferiority would have been declared if the upper limit of the 97.5% con dence interval (CI) of the mean difference (VDLT intubation time in group L minus that in group S) in the intubation time was below 10 s.…”
Section: Sample Size Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of using laryngoscopy to facilitate other airway management tools (e.g., to achieve a better glottis visualization) is not new. In numerous reports, either DL or VL has been used to assist fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) in various clinical scenarios [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. DL was also reported in combination with the fiberoptic stylet to assist in clinical and simulated difficult airway cases [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%