2020
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Performance of APACHE II, SOFA, and mNUTRIC Scoring Systems in Critically Ill Patients: A 2-year Cross-sectional Study

Abstract: A bstract Aims and objectives Different severity scores are being used to assess outcomes in intensive care unit, but variable data had been reported so far per their performance. Main objective of this study is to compare performance of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), and modified nutrition risk in critically ill (mNUTRIC) scoring systems regarding the outcomes in the form of morbidity and mortal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, we did not exclusively analyze the impact on blood glucose, that the type of nutritional support, or medication such as catecholamine, diuretic or antibiotics may have, the level of lactic acid was not documented either. Fourth, no consensus has been reached to point to the foremost tool for identifying the severity of critically ill patients 39 . More studies are required to evaluate various scoring tools for predicting mortality in ICU, such as sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, we did not exclusively analyze the impact on blood glucose, that the type of nutritional support, or medication such as catecholamine, diuretic or antibiotics may have, the level of lactic acid was not documented either. Fourth, no consensus has been reached to point to the foremost tool for identifying the severity of critically ill patients 39 . More studies are required to evaluate various scoring tools for predicting mortality in ICU, such as sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies are available on the validity of the mNUTRIC score, however, most of them are small samples [9][10][11][12] or retrospective studies [13][14][15], and there are few prospective studies with large samples at present [8,16,17]. The mNUTRIC score has not been widely used in China, where has been no large sample studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results reminds us that different responses to standard glucose control in patients with chronic hyperglycemia and normoglycemia should be considered [19] . Farid Fawzy believed that elevated glycemic gap and APACHE-II score were associated with an increased ICU mortality and their incorporation could predict the mortality of critically ill patients effectively [32] . Date showed that GAP adm with smaller AUC than previous studies, despite improvement attributed to incorporation of APACHE II, the AUC was lower than 0.70 yet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%