2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the performances of land use regression modelling and dispersion modelling in estimating small-scale variations in long-term air pollution concentrations in a Dutch urban area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
68
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of modeling methods using a large Dutch cohort concluded that dispersion models performed favorably compared with land use regression (44). We have previously applied these models in cross-sectional analyses of national English health survey data (45) and they have been used extensively by the UK Government for reporting to the European Commission (25) and for policy purposes including burden estimation (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of modeling methods using a large Dutch cohort concluded that dispersion models performed favorably compared with land use regression (44). We have previously applied these models in cross-sectional analyses of national English health survey data (45) and they have been used extensively by the UK Government for reporting to the European Commission (25) and for policy purposes including burden estimation (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore we investigated its significance for the health of the residents along the 80/h km zone in Rotterdam. With the URBIS model [2], we calculated the difference in EC concentrations with and without the 80 km/h speed limit for the existing 80 km/h zone in Rotterdam and for the whole ring road around Rotterdam. The result of this calculation for 2008 is shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Modelling Exercisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some studies suggested that LUR models explained small-scale variations in air pollution concentrations as well or even better than various dispersion models [8][9][10], Beelen et al [11] showed that the dispersion models performed better than LUR models regarding monitored and modeled concentrations on several validation sites. Most recently, de Hoogh et al [12] investigated agreement between LUR and DM modeling approaches aiming to estimate residential exposure to NO 2 and particulate matter (PM) with an aerodynamic diameter ď10 µm and ď2.5 µm (PM 10 , PM 2.5 ) within the European Study of Cohorts for Air Pollution Effects (ESCAPE).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%