2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the performances of Nero Siciliano pigs reared indoors and outdoors: 2. Joints composition, meat and fat traits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
40
4
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
19
40
4
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Carcass composition was not affected by rearing system, except for the ham percentage that was higher in the outdoor pigs. This result confirms the findings of Enfält et al (1997) that outdoor rearing would induce greater development of glycolytic muscles, particularly muscles of the ham, and it is in agreement with the results obtained on Nero Siciliano pig by Pugliese et al (2003Pugliese et al ( , 2004, which found higher percentage of ham and of lean within ham in outdoor reared pigs. On the contrary, Lebret et al (2002Lebret et al ( , 2011 did not show any significant effect of housing system on carcass muscle and ham percentage and on carcass Sirtori et al fatness.…”
Section: Growth Performancesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Carcass composition was not affected by rearing system, except for the ham percentage that was higher in the outdoor pigs. This result confirms the findings of Enfält et al (1997) that outdoor rearing would induce greater development of glycolytic muscles, particularly muscles of the ham, and it is in agreement with the results obtained on Nero Siciliano pig by Pugliese et al (2003Pugliese et al ( , 2004, which found higher percentage of ham and of lean within ham in outdoor reared pigs. On the contrary, Lebret et al (2002Lebret et al ( , 2011 did not show any significant effect of housing system on carcass muscle and ham percentage and on carcass Sirtori et al fatness.…”
Section: Growth Performancesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The proportions of SFA and PUFA of the BF found in the present trial (34% and 19%, respectively) differ than those reported by Latorre et al (2007) (39% and 15%, respectively) for heavy pigs reared indoor. The lower level of SFA in outdoor pigs is in agreement with several authors who have studied the effect of rearing system (out-and indoor) in local pig breeds, such as Cinta Senese (Pugliese et al, 2005), Nero Sicilano (Pugliese et al, 2004) or Iberian (Rey et al, 2006) and also in commercial breeds (Lebret et al, 2002). The reason for the higher percentage of PUFA in outdoors pigs could be that the grass intake increases the proportion of C18:3 (Rey et al, 2006) and grass is generally considered to have a high content of alpha-linolenic acid (Hö gberg et al, 2004).…”
Section: Fatty Acid Profile Of Subcutaneous and Intramuscular Fatsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, when pigs are intended for dry-cured processing, the IMF even achieves higher value because the dehydration makes the product dry and therefore the juiciness is sustained mainly in the lipid content (Ruiz-Carrascal et al, 2000). However, in the present trial, the IMF levels were lower than those found in local outdoor breeds slaughtered at similar weights such as Iberian (4.7-8.7%; Ventanas et al, 2006), Cinta Senese (4.0%; Pugliese et al, 2005) or Nero Siciliano (4.3%; Pugliese et al, 2004). An interesting observation in the present trial was that the DU progeny had similar BF but more IMF fat than the PI progeny, which is in agreement with the results of Latorre et al (2003a and2003b) comparing DU and PI 3 LW-sire lines.…”
Section: Meat Quality Traitscontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations