2023
DOI: 10.4097/kja.23064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the pericapsular nerve group block with the intra-articular and quadratus lumborum blocks in primary total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract: This article has been accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination, and proofreading processes, which may lead to differences between this version and the version of record.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent publications have provided insights on this comparison, with Wang et al finding lower pain scores in the PENG group immediately postoperatively, but no difference in opiate consumption compared to QL in an RCT [ 18 ]. Another RCT comparing PENG, QL, and local infiltration analgesia (LIA) techniques for patients undergoing THA with spinal anesthesia found similar analgesic benefit between PENG and QL [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent publications have provided insights on this comparison, with Wang et al finding lower pain scores in the PENG group immediately postoperatively, but no difference in opiate consumption compared to QL in an RCT [ 18 ]. Another RCT comparing PENG, QL, and local infiltration analgesia (LIA) techniques for patients undergoing THA with spinal anesthesia found similar analgesic benefit between PENG and QL [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dear Editor, We read with great interest the research study comparing the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with the quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and intraarticular injection in primary total hip arthroplasty by Et et al [1] in the recent issue of your esteemed journal. We would like to thank the authors for the quality of their work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hope that clarifying the points mentioned above will increase the validity of the manuscript. Response to "Comment on Single-shot regional anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis" Dear Editor, We would like to extend our gratitude to Dr. Raghuraman for his keen interest and invaluable insights [1] pertaining to our research article [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Response to "Comment on Single-shot regional anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis" Dear Editor, We would like to extend our gratitude to Dr. Raghuraman for his keen interest and invaluable insights [1] pertaining to our research article [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%