1975
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
2,777
0
18

Year Published

1983
1983
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4,519 publications
(2,807 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
12
2,777
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…As indicated in [21], considerable caution must be exercised when using amino acid sequence information to predict the secondary structural characteristics of proteins. The accuracy of the predictions for both P-sheet regions and for turns are generally lower than for the helices, and in a number of instances the agreement between prediction and observation is no better than would be expected for a random selection of residues.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated in [21], considerable caution must be exercised when using amino acid sequence information to predict the secondary structural characteristics of proteins. The accuracy of the predictions for both P-sheet regions and for turns are generally lower than for the helices, and in a number of instances the agreement between prediction and observation is no better than would be expected for a random selection of residues.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard benchmarking statistics were employed to evaluate performance such as the true-positive rate (sensitivity), the false-positive rate and the Matthew's Correlation Coefficient (MCC). 28 The MCC was employed as it represents one of the best available measures of prediction quality. It returns a value between − 1 and +1; a coefficient of − 1 represents the worst possible prediction, 0 a random prediction and +1 a perfect prediction.…”
Section: Functional Prediction Of Compensated Variants L Azevedo Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measures the expected accuracy of predicting an unknown protein. The accuracy of prediction for the three types of secondary structure was also measured, and, in addition, the Matthews' correlation coefficient (Matthews, 1975) was calculated for each secondary structure type:…”
Section: Prediction Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%