2016
DOI: 10.17795/semj38209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Prognostic Impact of Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet/Lymphocyte Ratio, and Glasgow Prognostic Score in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Abstract: Background: Given the role of inflammation in tumor progression, as well as in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), researchers are trying to identify easily applicable, easy accessible prognostic markers for individual risk assessment. The most frequently used inflammatory prognostic markers are the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS). Objectives: To determine and compare the prognostic value of the baseline inflammatory biomar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering this possible origin of PCNSL, systemic inflammation still could be assumed to affect the development of PCNSL. In our data, NLR 2.0 was identified as a relatively sensitive and specific point to discriminate high NLR and low NLR groups, but in most previous studies on DLBCL, an NLR of 3.0 to 5.0 was used as the distinguishing point [ 3 , 9 , 10 , 13 , 15 ]. The relatively low NLR cutoff in our data might reflect that PCNSL could develop in a relatively less severe inflammatory environment or even in an immune-deficient condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Considering this possible origin of PCNSL, systemic inflammation still could be assumed to affect the development of PCNSL. In our data, NLR 2.0 was identified as a relatively sensitive and specific point to discriminate high NLR and low NLR groups, but in most previous studies on DLBCL, an NLR of 3.0 to 5.0 was used as the distinguishing point [ 3 , 9 , 10 , 13 , 15 ]. The relatively low NLR cutoff in our data might reflect that PCNSL could develop in a relatively less severe inflammatory environment or even in an immune-deficient condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Six studies were conducted in China [12, 1416, 22, 23], one in Austria [11] and one in Croatia [13]. Five studies were published in English [11, 13, 14, 16, 22] and three in Chinese [12, 15, 23]. The total sample size was 1931, ranging from 59 to 515.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cut-off values of PLR ranged from 143 to 435. Five studies [1113, 16, 22] employed R-CHOP regimen and three studies [14, 15, 23] used R-CHOP/CHOP regimen. All eight studies [1116, 22, 23] reported the prognostic value of PLR on OS and seven studies [12–16, 22, 23] showed the association of PLR and PFS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering this possible origin of PCNSL, systemic inflammation still could be assumed to affect the development of PCNSL. In our data, NLR 2.0 was identified as a relatively sensitive and specific point to discriminate high NLR and low NLR groups, but in most previous studies on DLBCL, an NLR of 3.0 to 5.0 was used as the distinguishing point [3,9,10,13,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In recent years, many inflammatory markers such as NLR, PLR, RDW, and fibrinogen have been suggested as prognostic markers for various malignancies [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][12][13][14]. Ho et al also revealed that the absolute lymphocyte count-to-absolute monocyte count prognostic score (ALC/AMC PS) might provide additional prognostic information to the International Prognostic Index (IPI) for DLBCL [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%