2022
DOI: 10.17219/acem/144040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the radial and brachial artery flow-mediated dilation in patients with hypertension

Abstract: Background. Blood flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is a noninvasive assessment of vascular endothelial function in humans. The study of the FMD in hypertensive (HT) patients is an important factor supporting the recognition of the early mechanisms of cardiovascular pathologies, and also of the pathogenesis related to hypertension. Objectives.To investigate whether FMD measured on the radial artery (FMD-RA) using high-frequency ultrasounds can be used as an alternative to FMD assessed with the lower frequency syste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, Bland-Altman analysis is a simple and accurate way to quantify the agreement between two variables and can help clinicians compare a new measurement method with another method or with a reference standard. It has been applied to compare methods of blood pressure measurement, heart rate monitoring, artery-flow-mediated dilation and orthopedic surgery [11,29,34]. Additionally, it was also used to test agreement between different methods evaluating dietary habits [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, Bland-Altman analysis is a simple and accurate way to quantify the agreement between two variables and can help clinicians compare a new measurement method with another method or with a reference standard. It has been applied to compare methods of blood pressure measurement, heart rate monitoring, artery-flow-mediated dilation and orthopedic surgery [11,29,34]. Additionally, it was also used to test agreement between different methods evaluating dietary habits [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%