2022
DOI: 10.22336/rjo.2022.60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the results of four different refraction measurement devices in children with retinoscopy

Abstract: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only measurements from the right eye were included in the analysis [ 24 ]. Cycloplegic refraction and intraocular pressure (IOP) were evaluated in each eye using the autorefractometer (Auto Ref/Kerato/Tono/Pachymeter TonoRef, III Nidek, Gamagori, Japan) [ 25 , 26 ]. Cycloplegia was induced by administering 1% cyclopentolate twice, with a 5 min interval between doses, followed by refraction assessment 20 min after the second drop [ 27 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only measurements from the right eye were included in the analysis [ 24 ]. Cycloplegic refraction and intraocular pressure (IOP) were evaluated in each eye using the autorefractometer (Auto Ref/Kerato/Tono/Pachymeter TonoRef, III Nidek, Gamagori, Japan) [ 25 , 26 ]. Cycloplegia was induced by administering 1% cyclopentolate twice, with a 5 min interval between doses, followed by refraction assessment 20 min after the second drop [ 27 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%