2018
DOI: 10.3311/ppme.11194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Rotating Source Identifier and the Virtual Rotating Array Method

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to present two acoustic beamforming methods developed for rotating sources, namely the Rotating Source Identifier (ROSI) and the Virtual Rotating Array method (VRAM). These were applied onto a series of simulated test cases, and their behaviour was analysed. Both methods were able to localise the source reliably. However, the source strength was found to depend on the number or microphones when VRAM was applied. This phenomenon was quantified and an approximate formula was given provid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the future, the results can also be utilized for aeroacoustic purposes. Utilizing the drag coefficient, the frequency of profile vortex shedding can be determined, 8 and by means of supplementary phased array microphone measurements, 18,19 aeroacoustic phenomena can be investigated in detail.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, the results can also be utilized for aeroacoustic purposes. Utilizing the drag coefficient, the frequency of profile vortex shedding can be determined, 8 and by means of supplementary phased array microphone measurements, 18,19 aeroacoustic phenomena can be investigated in detail.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extensive comparison between VRA and ROSI algorithms has been conducted by Kotán et al [30], highlighting the increased computational cost of ROSI against the VRA method. Nevertheless, both techniques accurately predict the location and the strength of the rotating source.…”
Section: Acoustic Localization Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various comparisons of the three methods have been conducted [9][10][11]. The resulting delay and sum beamforming output for source localisation have been found to be almost equal for all the methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%