2014
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3502-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Sendai and Fukuoka Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Mucinous Cystic Lesions of the Pancreas: Are We Making Progress?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They were the first international consensus guidelines for the management of patients with mucinous PCLs. 17 They recommended surgical resection for all presumed main duct or mixed (main and branch) duct IPMNs and all MCNs. For presumed branch duct IPMNs, the Sendai guidelines recommend serial imaging for cysts up to 3 cm and surgical resection for cysts greater than 3 cm.…”
Section: Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They were the first international consensus guidelines for the management of patients with mucinous PCLs. 17 They recommended surgical resection for all presumed main duct or mixed (main and branch) duct IPMNs and all MCNs. For presumed branch duct IPMNs, the Sendai guidelines recommend serial imaging for cysts up to 3 cm and surgical resection for cysts greater than 3 cm.…”
Section: Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2004 at the 11th Congress of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) in Sendai, Japan, the Sendai Guidelines were developed and subsequently published in 2006. They were the first international consensus guidelines for the management of patients with mucinous PCLs 17 . They recommended surgical resection for all presumed main duct or mixed (main and branch) duct IPMNs and all MCNs.…”
Section: Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Sendai consensus guidelines and subsequent updated Fukuoka consensus guidelines have been widely adopted as an algorithm to direct the treatment strategies for mucinous PCN patients [ 2 , 3 ]. The high-risk parameters for malignancy in the guidelines were verified by several retrospective studies, but the outcomes have been controversial [ 4 , 5 ]. Some articles reported that many mucinous PCNs did not meet these criteria and were still proven to harbor high-grade dysplasia or even invasive cancers, and the validity of the guidelines were doubtful [ 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most crucial change in the updated guidelines was a shift of cyst size ≥3 cm from “ high‐risk stigmata ” to “ worrisome ,” requiring a follow‐up assessment by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or regular surveillance in the absence of other risk features. However, the controversy regarding the correlation between cyst size and AN remains and the safety and validity of both guidelines remain debatable …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%