Comparison of the shear bond strength of 2 self-etch primer/adhesive systems

Bishara, Samir E.; Oonsombat, Charuphan; Ajlouni, Raed; Laffoon, John F.

doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.04.010

Cited by 95 publications

(126 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…With regard to ARI, a previous study 21 demonstrated that TSEP presented all the adhesive remained on the tooth and another study reported that more than 90% of the adhesive remained on the tooth, 30 corroborating the present study, which showed most of the Transbond TM Plus Color Change specimens with over 50% of the adhesive on enamel. On the other hand, the two-step agents presented less than 50% of the adhesive on enamel.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 80%

“…This result showed the better adhesive stability of onestep when compared with two-step agent, under conditions that simulate great fluctuations of pH in the oral environment. According to the literature, 20,21 the bond strength of self-etching primers is similar to that of the twostep agents. However, the present study exhibited higher shear bond strength for TSEP/adhesive, Transbond TM Plus Color Change, when compared with Orthodontic Fill Magic, showing better properties for the one-step system than for the two-step agents, probably due to being less sensitive to technique.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 81%

“…This could be explained by the simultaneous action of phosphoric acid attack and primer that dissolve the enamel surface and allow penetration of the primer monomers into the demineralized enamel. 21 This could reduce the possibility of contamination during the bonding procedure, and for this reason, improve adhesion on enamel when compared with the two-step agents.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These systems combine the conditioning and priming agents into a single acidic primer solution for simultaneous use on both enamel and dentin. 21 However, there are no studies in the literature that assess bonding material properties under conditions that simulate the oral environment, such as using a pH cycling with a high cariogenic challenge model.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Mechanical properties of one and two-step fluoridated orthodontic resins submitted to different pH cycling regimes

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study is to assess the in vitro shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index (ARI) of one and two-step fluoridated orthodontic resins under conditions that simulate high cariogenic challenge. Edgewise brackets for maxillary central incisors were randomly bonded to 80 bovine incisors, using either Transbond TM Plus Color Change orthodontic resin and a self-etching primer adhesive (G1; n = 40) or Orthodontic Fill Magic with a conventional acid-etch technique (G2; n = 40). Each group of resin (n = 10) was divided into: immediate shear (A-pre-cycling control), immersion in artificial remineralizing saliva (neutral saliva) for 14 days (B-post-cycling control) and pH cycling with high cariogenic challenge (C-acid saliva with pH 5.5 and D-acid saliva with pH 4.5). After 14 days of pH cycling, the shear bond strength and ARI were evaluated. Considering the shear bond strength, Transbond TM Plus Color Change resin was stronger than Orthodontic Fill Magic when it was submitted to high cariogenic challenge (p < 0.05). Also Transbond TM Plus Color Change resin showed better adhesion to enamel than Orthodontic Fill Magic, in all situations evaluated (p < 0.05). It could be concluded that Transbond TM Plus Color Change resin presented better shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index when submitted to high cariogenic challenge, in comparison with Orthodontic Fill Magic.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 80%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 81%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Mechanical properties of one and two-step fluoridated orthodontic resins submitted to different pH cycling regimes

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[12][13][14] While these conditioners were initially developed for use on dentin, researchers have determined that adhesive systems combining conditioning and priming can be successfully used to bond orthodontic brackets to enamel. [15][16][17] It has been demonstrated that SBSs of brackets bonded using different self-etch primers (SEPs) were not significantly different from brackets bonded with the conventional acid-etch technique. 15,17 As each SEP is unique in formulation and conditioning aggressiveness, the manufacturers of these products typically recommend using a specific conditioning time and method to achieve optimal results.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Self-etchant Application Time on Bracket Shear Bond Strength

Ostby

Bishara

Laffoon

et al. 2007

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To determine the influence of self-etching primer (SEP) application time on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Materials and Methods: Forty human molars were cleaned, mounted, and randomly divided into two groups. The same SEP, adhesive, and brackets were used in both groups. Twenty teeth were conditioned following the manufacturers' recommendations by rubbing the SEP on the enamel surface for 3 to 5 seconds. The remaining 20 teeth were conditioned using the same SEP, but the application time was increased to 15 seconds. The teeth were debonded within half an hour following initial bonding using a universal testing machine. After debonding, the amount of residual adhesive remaining on the tooth was determined. Student's t-test was used to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of the two groups, and the 2 test was used to compare the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) scores for the two adhesive systems. Results: The mean SBS of the brackets bonded to the teeth subjected to the SEP for 3 to 5 seconds was 8.0 Ϯ 4.6 MPa and was not significantly different (t ϭ Ϫ0.69, P ϭ .494) from the SBS of the brackets bonded using a 15-second SEP application time (x ϭ 8.9 Ϯ 3.4 MPa). The comparisons of the ARI scores between the two groups ( 2 ϭ 2.16) indicated that bracket failure mode was not significantly different (P ϭ .340) for both groups, and most failures were at the bracket-adhesive interface. Conclusion:The present findings indicate that increasing the SEP application from 3 to 5 seconds to 15 seconds does not result in a significant increase in SBS.

show abstract

Investigation of Shear-Peel Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets on Enamel after Using Pro Seal™

et al. 2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although the statistical evaluation showed no significant negative influence on the shear-peel bond strength either when Pro Seal was used in addition, or when that fluoride-releasing, light-curing sealant was substituted for the bonding agent recommended by the manufacturer, the Weibull analysis showed that the use of Pro Seal in combination with SEP resulted in bond strength values that were less reliably reproducible.

show abstract

Comparison of the shear bond strength of 2 self-etch primer/adhesive systems

Cited by 95 publications

References 4 publications

Mechanical properties of one and two-step fluoridated orthodontic resins submitted to different pH cycling regimes

Mechanical properties of one and two-step fluoridated orthodontic resins submitted to different pH cycling regimes

Influence of Self-etchant Application Time on Bracket Shear Bond Strength

Investigation of Shear-Peel Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets on Enamel after Using Pro Seal™

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About