2017
DOI: 10.1111/jsap.12639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the spread of two different volumes of contrast medium when performing ultrasound‐guided transversus abdominis plane injection in dog cadavers

Abstract: Injection of 1 mL/kg of diluted contrast did not result in wider cranio-caudal spread in the transversus abdominis muscle plane of dog cadavers when compared with 0 · 5 mL/kg. Intraperitoneal injection is a risk and might be reduced with good needle visualisation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
11
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
11
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that, despite the high volume used, in a clinical context, a single injection of local anaesthetic would not be able to adequately cover all abdominal sensory branches in the TAP. Moreover, in agreement with the results of Zoff et al and Romano et al [16,23], we found a significant dorsoventral diffusion (44.48 ± 9.26 mm). This showed that the use of large volumes probably does not improve the craniocaudal spread (48.91 ± 7.56 mm) but induces diffusion of local anaesthetic evenly over the entire abdominal wall.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that, despite the high volume used, in a clinical context, a single injection of local anaesthetic would not be able to adequately cover all abdominal sensory branches in the TAP. Moreover, in agreement with the results of Zoff et al and Romano et al [16,23], we found a significant dorsoventral diffusion (44.48 ± 9.26 mm). This showed that the use of large volumes probably does not improve the craniocaudal spread (48.91 ± 7.56 mm) but induces diffusion of local anaesthetic evenly over the entire abdominal wall.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Compared to classic neuraxial techniques, fascial plane blocks are considered at low risk of nerve injury and relatively easy to perform; however, it should be emphasised that the TAP block only provides somatic analgesia (from the ventrolateral skin of the abdomen to the peritoneum); therefore, during surgery involving visceral pain, systemic drugs are needed to achieve adequate analgesia [15,23]. Either way, according to the current literature in human and veterinary medicine, the TAP block has been demonstrated to produce great results as part of a multimodal approach in the management of perioperative abdominal pain [15][16][17]24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conflicting evidence about the effect of the injected volume on the spread of the solution have been reported in both humans (Carney et al 2011;Moeschler at al. 2013;Forero et al 2015) and dogs (Bruggink et al 2012;Zoff et al 2017b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Injection in the TAP without optimal visualisation has been shown to correlate with inadvertent intra‐abdominal injection (Frigon and others 2006). Inadvertent puncture of abdominal organs has been described in humans undergoing a TAP block (Farooq and Carey 2008, Lancaster and Chadwick 2010, Zoff and others 2017) and thus this should be considered a risk that can be minimised by the use of ultrasound guidance and by avoiding the advancement of the needle without ultrasound visualisation of the tip. Inadvertent intra‐abdominal injection has been previously described in human medicine and was also seen in up to 25 per cent of the injections in canine cadavers (Zoff and others 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%