2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the strain developed around implants with angled abutments with two reinforced polymeric CAD-CAM superstructure materials: An in vitro comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the retention and wear characteristics of this material, the results are excellent, guaranteeing long-term good results both in terms of resistance and wear [38,39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the retention and wear characteristics of this material, the results are excellent, guaranteeing long-term good results both in terms of resistance and wear [38,39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…It has no abrasive effect on the remaining teeth, has white color suitable for fully anatomical use, and insures no ion exchange in the mouth, no discoloration, excellent stability, and optimal polishable properties [45]. However, lithium disilicate remains the gold standard of this type of rehabilitation [38]. Therefore, also for this application, BioHPP ® has proven to have excellent characteristics and clinical reliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the in vitro study by Omaish et al, the microstrain values recorded around implants restored with TRINIA TM were also significantly lower than those restored with bioactive high-performance polymer (BioHPP) when a static load was applied, with considerably higher microstrain when the implant abutment angulation increased [37]. Reduced stress transmission might reduce the risk of biological and technical complications in implantsupported rehabilitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The masticatory robot set-up of the University of Genova (Italy) used in previously published papers [34,35] (Figure 1) was used to compare the shock absorption capacity of 2 polymeric materials: the polyetherketoneketone Pekkton ® ivory (Cendres+Mètaux SA, Biel/Bienne, Switzerland) and the glass fiber-reinforced nanohybrid composite resin TRINIA TM (Bicon, Boston, MA, USA), which consists of 60% multi-directional interlacing glass fibers (woven configuration) and 40% epoxy resin in several layers [16,[36][37][38] (Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strain gauges were used to evaluate the strain developed around the implants. The models made of TRINIA exhibited significantly lower microstrains compared to models made of BioHPP(52).However, there were contrasting results on this topic, Cibirka et al designed a study to determine the force absorption ratio for three materials used in the implant: gold, porcelain, and dual-cured composite resin. The self-tapping implant was inserted in a human cadaver mandible, applied force through a peanut sample, and measured microstrains with a strain gauge stuck at the lingual bone surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%