2022
DOI: 10.35754/0234-5730-2022-67-4-460-477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the treatment results in adult patients with acute Ph-negative lymphoblastic leukemia on protocols of the Russian multicenter studies ALL-2009 and ALL-2016

Abstract: Introduction. Over the past 5 years, signifi cant progress has been achieved in the treatment of patients with Ph-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Treatment results were compared between two protocols of the Russian multicenter studies «ALL-2009» and «ALL-2016», in which multicomponent high-dose consolidation was not used. The principle of continuity of treatment was observed with modifi cation of doses of cytostatic drugs depending on the depth of cytopenia.Aim – to compare the 5-year results of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past 5 years, significant progress has been achieved in the treatment and molecular diagnosis of B-ALL. According to Parovichnikova et al [1], two laboratory parameters remain associated with poor disease outcomes. Any abnormal cytogenetic karyotype, excluding hyperploidy, and measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity on day +70 (after completion of two phases induction therapy) are considered as risk factors for Ph-negative B-cell ALL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past 5 years, significant progress has been achieved in the treatment and molecular diagnosis of B-ALL. According to Parovichnikova et al [1], two laboratory parameters remain associated with poor disease outcomes. Any abnormal cytogenetic karyotype, excluding hyperploidy, and measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity on day +70 (after completion of two phases induction therapy) are considered as risk factors for Ph-negative B-cell ALL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%