2011
DOI: 10.5641/027013611x13275191444189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Validity of Four Fall-Related Psychological Measures in a Community-Based Falls Risk Screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not surprising since the FES-I contain five walking related items (out of 16) and targets fear of falling in relation to activities (Bladh, Nilsson, Carlsson et al, 2013). In healthy older adults (mean age 74 years) the mean value of FES-I is 29 points, similar to our participants (Moore, Ellis, Kosma et al, 2011). In the present study there was no significant correlation between PA and incidence of falls, even if the occurrence of falls (60%) was considerably higher than in older adults (fall frequency 20-40%) (Gillespie et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is not surprising since the FES-I contain five walking related items (out of 16) and targets fear of falling in relation to activities (Bladh, Nilsson, Carlsson et al, 2013). In healthy older adults (mean age 74 years) the mean value of FES-I is 29 points, similar to our participants (Moore, Ellis, Kosma et al, 2011). In the present study there was no significant correlation between PA and incidence of falls, even if the occurrence of falls (60%) was considerably higher than in older adults (fall frequency 20-40%) (Gillespie et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…A higher score indicates that the participant is more concerned about falling. FES-I has been shown to have good psychometric properties (Yardley, Beyer, Hauer et al, 2005) and is commonly used to assess fear of falling in elderly, and in persons with different neurological diseases (Bladh, Nilsson, Carlsson, & Lexell, 2013;Blennerhassett, Dite, Ramage, & Richmond, 2012;Brogardh & Lexell, 2014;Moore et al, 2011).…”
Section: Falls Efficacy Scale -International (Fes-i)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Balance confidence refers to an individual's confidence to maintain their balance and avoid falling over when undertaking their ADL [8,9]. Loss of balance confidence is a cause for concern as it may result in activity restriction, which can consequently increase sensorimotor deconditioning and subsequently increase the older person's risk of falls [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confidence questionnaires is used to assess falls self-efficacy in participants as it is valid for total falls risk and can distinguish between fallers and non-fallers (Mak, Pang, & Mok, 2012;Moore et al, 2011). A fall is defined as an event resulting in a person coming to rest unintentionally on the ground or lower level, not as a result of a major intrinsic event (such as a stroke) or an overwhelming hazard (Lamb, Jorstad-Stein, Hauer, & Becker, 2005).…”
Section: Quantitative Datamentioning
confidence: 99%