1988
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.19.1.31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the WAIS and WAIS—R: Different results for different IQ groups.

Abstract: Using a procedure that eliminated repetition of identical items, thus avoiding order effects, we administered the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) and the WAis-Revised to 108 subjects. AH correlations between the two tests were significant and similar to those reported in the WAIS-R manual. For the group as a whole, verbal, performance, and full scale IQ scores on the WAIS-R were significantly lower than their respective WAIS scores; however, this difference was not consistent across IQ levels. Subject… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
7
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The main findings do not support those of Spitz (1989) or Spruill & Beck (1988) who found that the effect of the Flynn effect upon IQ scores reversed (producing a negative difference between IQ scores due to a higher, not a lower IQ score achieved on the most recent version of the IQ test) for those with a Full Scale IQ of <70. These authors tested differences between the WAIS and the WAIS-R. Spitz (1989) refers to Flynn (1985) for an explanation of these findings, suggesting that the disparity is due to a low number of individuals in the retarded range in the stratified samples of the WAIS tests causing discrepancies when converting raw scores into IQ scores.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Comparisons Of Various Scales Across Studiescontrasting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The main findings do not support those of Spitz (1989) or Spruill & Beck (1988) who found that the effect of the Flynn effect upon IQ scores reversed (producing a negative difference between IQ scores due to a higher, not a lower IQ score achieved on the most recent version of the IQ test) for those with a Full Scale IQ of <70. These authors tested differences between the WAIS and the WAIS-R. Spitz (1989) refers to Flynn (1985) for an explanation of these findings, suggesting that the disparity is due to a low number of individuals in the retarded range in the stratified samples of the WAIS tests causing discrepancies when converting raw scores into IQ scores.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Comparisons Of Various Scales Across Studiescontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…Furthermore, the combination of samples in the analysis may have increased the amount of variance due to sample or design factors, rather than due to differences in IQ scores. Spruill & Beck (1988) produced the same findings reported by Spitz (1989) in a study design that did not have the same methodological limitations. WAIS and WAIS-R were concurrently administered to a sample of students of varying IQ levels applying for special education services (n ¼ 108).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations