2002
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/35/15/305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of theoretical and absolute experimental fully differential cross sections for ion-atom impact ionization

Abstract: We report fully differential cross section (FDCS) calculations and absolute measurements for ion-atom impact ionization. Using the COLTRIMS (cold target recoil ion momentum spectroscopy) method, we have obtained absolute FDCS both in the scattering plane as

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
96
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
9
96
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Stefani et al (1990), Whelan et al (1993)). The theoretical results, which include higher-order contributions in the interaction of the projectile with the target beyond the FBA (for details see Madison et al (2002)) were found to be nearly cylindrically symmetric around the q v -axis, a feature characteristic for any first order approach. The sharp 3D minimum at the origin indicates both, the absence of higher-order processes as well as the dominance of dipole transitions.…”
Section: Single Ionisation At Small and Large Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Stefani et al (1990), Whelan et al (1993)). The theoretical results, which include higher-order contributions in the interaction of the projectile with the target beyond the FBA (for details see Madison et al (2002)) were found to be nearly cylindrically symmetric around the q v -axis, a feature characteristic for any first order approach. The sharp 3D minimum at the origin indicates both, the absence of higher-order processes as well as the dominance of dipole transitions.…”
Section: Single Ionisation At Small and Large Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[5]. It is correct for small momentum transfers, when the velocity of the recoil ion is practically zero.…”
Section: From the Energy Conservation Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding was particularly surprising given the fact that the measurements were carried out under kinematical conditions which are believed to be perfectly suitable for applicability of perturbative approaches: (i) |Z p |/v p = 0.1 a.u., where Z p and v p are the projectile charge and velocity, respectively, and (ii) small energy-and momentum-transfer values. Further discussions involved various attempts to explain the source of the discrepancies in the nodal structure, ranging from higher-order [4][5][6][7][8] and non-perturbative mechanisms [7,[9][10][11][12]] to experimental uncertainties [8,13] and so-called projectile coherence effects [14]. Though the explanation due to experimental uncertainties alone was refuted in [15], the very recent 1-MeV p+He experiment at momentum transfer of 0.75 a.u.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the experimental cross sections were very well reproduced not only by a sophisticated Continuum Distorted Wave -Hartree-Fock (CDW-HF) calculation, but even by the first Born approximation [24]. It was therefore very surprising when qualitative and large discrepancies were found for the cross sections outside the scattering plane [25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%