“…5), and thehigh-temperature conditions accelerated the polymerization of the coke precursor,increasingcoke formation.At 723 K in SCW + CO, there wasalmost no oil in the reactor and the ratio of heavy products with apparent boiling points of 723-773 K and of more than773 K in the extract oil was higher than under the other conditions.In this case, the distribution of oil from the oil-rich phase to the water-rich phase wasincreased considerablyby the high temperature.Almost all theoil containingcoke precursorswas probably distributed in thewater-rich phase and quickly passed through the reactor without much reaction.However, the coke yield reached its maximum at 713 K.The transfer of oil from the oil-rich phase to the water-rich phase was increased at 713 K, althoughvery heavy fractions, such as coke precursors,maynot have entered thewater-rich phase and remained in the oil-rich phase.Thesecoke precursorscould not dissolve in the small amount of oil in the oil-rich phaseand became coke.The lightest extract oil was obtained at 693 K.At 693 K, the amount of oil in the oil-rich phase was sufficientto dissolve the coke precursor effectively.The coke formation was suppressed by the high solubility of the coke precursors in oil, and coke formationproceededslowly because of thelow temperature.The decomposition of oil proceeded overa long retention time where the transfer of oil from the oil-rich phase to the water-rich phase was less than that above 17 693 K.Furthermore, the long retention time probably improved the hydrogenation of the coke precursor in the oil-rich phase through the WGSR.These factorsmay have contributed tothe effective upgrading of oil at 693 K.Finally, we compared the results in this study with previous resultsobtained in SCW.Morimoto et al compared various results for oil sand bitumen cracking[26].They focused the relationship between coke yield and conversion based on the boiling point of oil.We compared our results with other results in SCW according to their method.The conversion and coke yield aresummarized inTable 2.The conversion was defined by the amount of oil withhigher boiling points than the cut point.The trends can be discussed to some extent, although the definition of conversion was different under each set of conditions.…”