2019
DOI: 10.14235/bas.galenos.2018.2798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Third Generation Proximal Femoral Nails in Treatment of Reverse Oblique Intertrochanteric Fractures

Abstract: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the treatment results of reverse oblique AO/OTA 31A1 fractures that have highly mechanical instability risk with two third generation intramedullary nails. Methods: Twenty-eight patients (8 men, 20 women) treated by third generation proximal femoral nails [proximal femoral anti-rotation (PFNA)® or Intertan®] followed minimum one year were included. Average age was 65.0 (31-93) years. Clinical and radiological results, screw migration at one year and complications were re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HHS was the most reported functional outcome for patients with intertrochanteric fractures, as reported in multiple studies [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ], and in these reports, no statistically significant differences in HHS were found among PFN groups. Similar to the current study, a 2015 study by Uzer et al [ 12 ] compared HHS values between patients who had InterTAN and PROFIN nails and found no significant difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…HHS was the most reported functional outcome for patients with intertrochanteric fractures, as reported in multiple studies [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ], and in these reports, no statistically significant differences in HHS were found among PFN groups. Similar to the current study, a 2015 study by Uzer et al [ 12 ] compared HHS values between patients who had InterTAN and PROFIN nails and found no significant difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…We included 69 studies reflecting a total of 48,978 patients with sample sizes ranging from 28 [35] to 13,939 [36]. Fifty-one studies were observational and 18 studies were randomised clinical trials, which compared different surgical procedures.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparisons of different internal fixation procedures, intramedullary implant facilitators included the intramedullary nail with auxiliary locking plate (compared with intramedullary nail with steel wire) [93], Proximal femoral nail antirotating (PFNA) with cerclage cables (compared with PFNA alone) [63], intramedullary nail with cerclage cable (compared with intramedullary nail alone) [91], and PFNA-II (compared with interTan and profn nails) [57]. The interTan and PFNA [35,83], and pertrochanteric nails and PFNA [79] were not associated with weight bearing. Extramedullary implant facilitators included dynamic compression locking system (DCLS) (compared with multiple cannulated compression screw (MCCS)) [84], percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) (compared with Dynamic hip screw (DHS)) [80], DHS with scaffold enriched with the autologous bone marrow stem cells concentrate (compared with DHS alone) [92], and Medoff sliding plate (MSP) (compared with Dynamic condylar screw, DHS and DHS with trochanteric stabilizing plate) [73].…”
Section: Process (Surgical) (Table 3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most frequently reported functional outcome was the Harris Hip Score (HHS) with ten studies reporting this outcome for patients with unstable fractures [12,15,16,18,[37][38][39]41,43,44] . No significant differences were seen between groups for HHS for any comparison (data not shown, p = 0.18 for INTERTAN vs other IM nails in unstable fractures).…”
Section: Functional Outcomes/promsmentioning
confidence: 99%