2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2005.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of three assays for the quantification of Candida biomass in suspension and CDC reactor grown biofilms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
66
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
66
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, biofilms were produced in microtitre plates as follows. Saturated cultures in SD 2 % glucose were diluted to OD 600 0.05 in 100 ml RPMI 1640 medium in 96-well microtitre plates and incubated at 37 uC for 24 h. The microtitre plates were then washed with PBS using a HydroFlex platform (Tecan) and 100 ml of a 16 FDA solution (506 stock: fluorescein diacetate, 2 g l 21 in acetone; diluted to 16 in PBS) was added per well (Honraet et al, 2005). Plates were wrapped in aluminium foil and incubated for 1 h at 37 uC before measuring fluorescence in a Tecan Infinite M200 microplate reader using an excitation filter of 486±9 nm and an emission filter of 535±20 nm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, biofilms were produced in microtitre plates as follows. Saturated cultures in SD 2 % glucose were diluted to OD 600 0.05 in 100 ml RPMI 1640 medium in 96-well microtitre plates and incubated at 37 uC for 24 h. The microtitre plates were then washed with PBS using a HydroFlex platform (Tecan) and 100 ml of a 16 FDA solution (506 stock: fluorescein diacetate, 2 g l 21 in acetone; diluted to 16 in PBS) was added per well (Honraet et al, 2005). Plates were wrapped in aluminium foil and incubated for 1 h at 37 uC before measuring fluorescence in a Tecan Infinite M200 microplate reader using an excitation filter of 486±9 nm and an emission filter of 535±20 nm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). We (and others) have previously shown that the XTT-reduction assay shows excellent correlation between cellular density and metabolic activity, thus providing a semiquantitative measurement of biofilm formation [22][23][24][25][26] . This colorimetric assay is non-invasive and non-destructive, requiring minimal postprocessing of samples as compared to other alternative methods (such as viable cell counts) and has the additional advantage that, in contrast to other methods such as crystal violet staining and dry mass measurements, it correlates with cell viability which is particularly useful for measuring the effects of drugs on biofilm cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, results using the XTT-colorimetric assay to compare biofilm-forming ability by different isolates need to be interpreted with caution since it has been reported that different fungal species and even strains from the same species show marked differences in their ability to metabolize the XTT substrate 27 . In addition, alterations in the metabolic states during the different phases of biofilm formation may lead to fluctuations in the ability of cells within the biofilms to metabolize this dye 23,27 . Some more recent articles indicate that the use of other vital stains (SYTO9, propidium iodide), fluorogenic assays or bioluminescence may represent alternatives and have some practical advantages over the use of XTT 23,24,28 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This methodology was based on a continuous flow model in which growth media flowed at a specified rate, and was baffled stirred in order to generate shear force. Biofilm accumulation was then quantified by harvesting the biofilm from coupons of a known surface area, disaggregating the cells and polymeric matrix, and subsequently performing viable plate counts [14][15]. In this experimental design, this procedure was repeated with the coupon system replaced with a tongue model previously cast in resin from a tongue impression taken from a patient suffering from halitosis ( Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%