2004
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2004.1919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Three Enzyme Immunoassays for Measuring 17β‐Estradiol in Flushed Dairy Manure Wastewater

Abstract: Natural steroidal estrogens are an environmental concern because low nanogram per liter concentrations in water can adversely affect aquatic vertebrate species by disrupting the normal function of their endocrine systems. There is a critical need to accurately measure estrogens in dairy wastes, a potential source of estrogens such as 17beta-estradiol, to assess the risk of estrogen contamination of agricultural drainage waters resulting from land application. Commercially available enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The E2Eq values (a determinant of estrogenic activity) paralleled the fE concentrations in non-hydrolyzed samples (Figure 2 filled bar), but paralleled total estrogen concentrations in hydrolyzed samples (Figure 2, white bar). Concentrations of free and conjugated estrogens observed in the present study were lower than those reported by and Williams (2001), but comparable to those reported by Hanselman, et al (2004). The inter-study differences may be due to the differences in the manure-facilities and/or analytical procedures used.…”
Section: Total Estrogen Concentrations and Estrogenic Activitysupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The E2Eq values (a determinant of estrogenic activity) paralleled the fE concentrations in non-hydrolyzed samples (Figure 2 filled bar), but paralleled total estrogen concentrations in hydrolyzed samples (Figure 2, white bar). Concentrations of free and conjugated estrogens observed in the present study were lower than those reported by and Williams (2001), but comparable to those reported by Hanselman, et al (2004). The inter-study differences may be due to the differences in the manure-facilities and/or analytical procedures used.…”
Section: Total Estrogen Concentrations and Estrogenic Activitysupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Due to its relative ease of use and ability to provide quick results, the ELISA method has been popular for assessing the concentrations of estrogens in agricultural runoff (Hanselman et al, 2004). However, many of the studies that have estimated estrogen concentrations solely using ELISA have reported fairly high values (Finlay‐Moore et al, 2000; Jenkins et al, 2009; Nichols et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the detection limits reported by Raman et al (2001) are poor (10 μg L −1 ) relative to the endogenous concentrations of steroidal estrogens (ng L −1 ) likely to be found in dilute dairy wastes such as FDMW (Kolodziej et al, 2004). Regardless of detection limit restrictions, liquid‐liquid ether extraction of FDMW gives a sample that is not of sufficient quality for quantitative derivatization and introduction into the GC‐MS (Hanselman et al, 2004). Thus, a more extensive extraction and purification technique is required for the analysis of wastes such as FDMW.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative enzyme immunoassays have been used in previous studies for measuring estrogens in dairy waste (Raman et al, 2001). However, previous work in our laboratory showed that enzyme immunoassays were prone to matrix interference which resulted in inaccurate quantification of estrogen in dairy waste (Hanselman et al, 2004). Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) based methods are more conclusive than immunoassays, but few of these techniques have been developed for measuring estrogens in livestock waste (Raman et al, 2001;Fine et al, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%