2015
DOI: 10.3928/1081597x-20151021-05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Three Epithelial Removal Techniques in PRK: Mechanical, Alcohol-assisted, and Transepithelial Laser

Abstract: Significant differences were detected in both the visual outcomes and the refractive results of the three epithelial removal techniques. The long-term outcomes were best for alcohol-assisted PRK.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results with both EtOH-PRK and TransPRK are similar to recent results published literature with EtOH-PRK in high myopia 13 14. Interestingly, Shapira et al have noted slight undercorrection with TransPRK as compared EtOH-PRK and mechanical PRK on the Allegretto Wave Excimer Laser platform.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our results with both EtOH-PRK and TransPRK are similar to recent results published literature with EtOH-PRK in high myopia 13 14. Interestingly, Shapira et al have noted slight undercorrection with TransPRK as compared EtOH-PRK and mechanical PRK on the Allegretto Wave Excimer Laser platform.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The coefficient of correlation R should be greater than 0.70 to show a good linear correlation. The coefficient of determination, denoted by R [2], was calculated to measure the percentage of variability of R in function of the variability of E. It ranges in value from 0 to 100%. The coefficient of determination R 2 should be greater than or equal to 50%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to perform trans-epithelial refractive laser ablation, the exact knowledge of the epithelial thickness and the ablation rate of the epithelium and of the stroma is mandatory. Excess ablation wastes stromal tissue and variations in epithelial thickness of the ablated area may influence refractive outcome [1,2]. Under-estimation of these parameters may contribute to a reduction of the optical zone while an incorrect evaluation of the epithelium profile to be ablated may affect the aspherical treatment outcome due to the different ablation rate and, consequently, different ablation profile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations